• corm@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh shut up, ecars cause less environmental damage than normal cars by far. Yes they require lithium. The lithium required doesn’t get close to the damage of 300k miles worth of gas.

    “but power plants burn coal for that electricity”

    Not mine. I live in portland and have signed up for 100% renewable power. That’s a your-city problem. You should work on that.

    • lgsp@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There are many studies that show that replacing all gas cars with electric cars won’t come close to reduction of carbon emissions needed on transportaion fields.

      Morever they have all the problems that cars have:

      • weight inefficent: 1 or 2 tons to move 1 80 kg person
      • space inefficent: to move one person you need one parking spot at home, one at the job, one at the grocery store…
      • dangerous: car crashes are the main cause of death among younger ages. Electric cars are heavier, so they are more dangerous.
      • huge infrastructure needed: to move cars you need highways, which are many times less efficient from a area point if view that any other mide of transportation.
      • expensive infrastructure to build and mantain. Riad manteunance drll the worst kind of holes in public funding. Electric cars weight more, making this issue worse
      • Car oriented development is ugly and inefficent. You can’t have both a nice neighborhood and enough car parking space,
      • Cars are terribly expensive to buy and mantain

      Forse sure I’m forgetting quite a lot of things

    • 1993_toyota_camry@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think you’re arguing points that weren’t made.

      Individually owned automobiles and the systems required to support them are wasteful and polluting no matter how you power them.

      Electric cars are better, yes. But their popularity is in a large part because they allow us to mostly maintain the status quo.

      Do you think they are a sustainable long-term solution? Should we be planning our future around paved roads made almost exclusively for personally owned mostly single-occupant vehicles?

      • corm@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s two months later and I’ve done a 180 on this opinion and went from “fuck gas cars” to “fuck all cars”.

        The car infrastructure is the shitty part, not so much the cars

        • CurtAdams@urbanists.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          @corm @1993_toyota_camry Sort of? All cars ruin our lives. But gas cars also ruin the planet, where electric are substially better now and will be almost carbon free in 30 years or so. Getting rid of cars in general is very desirable, but getting rid of gas cars is an existential necessity.

    • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Electric cars help pollution like filtered cigarettes help smoker health. It’s a tangible improvement, but on the grand scale of things it’s not a significant improvement.