“While attempting to take the man into custody, he did not comply with multiple commands to stop, and he physically resisted when troopers tried to remove him from the car,” a state police statement said.
    “Troopers shot the man when he continued to drive in a manner that placed officers in imminent danger,” the statement continued.

    Why kill him, though? Why even try to pull him out of the car? Cops have the perp cornered in his car, so why didn’t they let the air out of all four tires, and sit in the squad car eating doughnuts until he gets bored and gives up?

      • eltimablo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Considering how absolutely careless so many people are on the road, I’d be 100% fine with it. If they’re allowed to put me at risk of death by doing 100 MPH in a 45 MPH zone, why can’t I defend myself from them? If some idiot was running around a store waving a gun, I’d hope he would get shot as well, but because it’s a car all of a sudden it’s sacred ground? No, get the fuck out of here.

        • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Right except it doesn’t stop the machine, does it? If you kill the driver, they’ll probably not hit the brakes right?

          So the cop would still be dead if the car was actually driving towards them, or if the cop could dodge then the excuse for shooting was obviously false.

    • lolcatnip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      You’d change your tune real fast when a cop driving recklessly hits and kills your pet or family. Then you’d be screaming why the cops couldn’t stop the idiot prior.