In a recent study, researchers from the European Environmental Bureau (EEB), the Stockholm School of Economics (SSE), and the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) questioned the planned development of new nuclear capacities in the energy strategies of the United States and certain European countries.
    • schroedingershat@lemmy.worldEnglish
      12·
      10 months ago

      When you demand free insurance from someone they get to set the risk profile.

      Tell you what. You put up collateral equal to the value of any nearby city and everything in it, and you can stop ALARA.

      Also even with that it’s still bullshit. Nuclear had a higher negative learning rate before ALARA and is still horrifically expensive outside the US.

      Also the suggestion that wind and solar aren’t subject to more extreme regulation on potential harms is even more ridiculous.