In my humble opinion, the Technology community should only contain text news/articles or even news pictures.

I simply think that tech videos does not belong to this community, as there is already a videos community which would be more suitable for this.

What does the mods think about this?

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Exactly. And with AI tools, getting a transcript and generating a summary shouldn’t be all that hard.

    All I’m looking for is a handful of bullet points that give me a reason to watch the video. I’m not watching a random video someone posts just based on the headline, I need a bit more reason to invest my time to contribute to the discussion. And if you provide a basic summary, I’ll probably do the legwork and find some articles to add to the discussion while I’m watching the video.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Exactly. And with AI tools, getting a transcript and generating a summary shouldn’t be all that hard.

      Write a summary bot then.

      I’m not watching a random video someone posts just based on the headline

      Then don’t.

      I need a bit more reason to invest my time to contribute to the discussion.

      You’re not that important. If you don’t contribute to a discussion just because the submission is a video, nobody will notice.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m not specifically talking about myself, I’m explaining the sentiment I see here. Me personally not contributing to those posts probably won’t impact anything, and that’s fine. But there’s a lot of pushback from people who prefer text.

        All I’m saying is to put in a little effort to link a relevant text article or add a few bullet points that the video covers. That’s it. The barrier to posting stuff should be a little higher than just sending links to things that seem somewhat interesting.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I’m explaining the sentiment I see here.

          The sentiment here is that a loud minority cries about a tiny fraction of submissions when they could just not watch the videos in the first place.

          All I’m saying is to put in a little effort to link a relevant text article or add a few bullet points that the video covers. That’s it.

          Literally nobody is stopping you from doing that for other submissions. Don’t task unpaid community members to do work for you, just because you don’t like videos.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I mean, I do that sometimes, and it’s honestly not hard. If I post a video, I post a short summary about why I think it’s relevant. I expect the same from others.

            And no, I’m not paid either.

            • woelkchen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I mean, I do that sometimes, and it’s honestly not hard.

              Keep doing it for your stuff, don’t try to make a rule for others to do the same.

              I expect the same from others.

              That’s the problem. You shouldn’t. It’s not your call to make. Deal with it.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                You’re right, it’s not my call, which is why this is a Meta post for community discussion, which will ultimately require buy-in from the mods (i.e. those who would enforce such rules). I’m providing my $0.02 to the discussion.