• Socialist Berserker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh, ok, cool. Then the Democratic and Republican parties have nothing to fear from her.

    So they should be fine with debating her and having her on the ballot. I mean, hey she’s “completely irrelevant,” right?

    • MentallyExhausted
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Being completely irrelevant, there’s no reason to waste time debating her, but if she meets the criteria for either I don’t think anybody cares.

      • Socialist Berserker@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Being completely irrelevant, there’s no reason to waste time debating her, but if she meets the criteria for either I don’t think anybody cares.

        So what is threshold do you think she, or ANY 3rd party candidate, needs to meet to be considered worthy of a debate? Serious question. Because her party is the 4th biggest political party in the US. Behind Libertarians.

        • MentallyExhausted
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t care about this. Until FPTP is eliminated, third parties are irrelevant.

          • Socialist Berserker@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            third parties are irrelevant.

            Then you have nothing to fear, nor do you have anything to be annoyed about, when it comes to the existence of 3rd parties and the voting for 3rd parties.