• silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It is an indirect democracy, rather than a direct one. Its less democratic, but not completely undemocratic.

    That being said, I do think the system is broken in another fundamental way.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is an indirect democracy, rather than a direct one.

      Ahem. Indirect democracy AKA representative democracy AKA republic is political system, where laws are voted by representatives who are elected by citizens. USA is indirect indirectracy. Or idiocracy. Like Putin’s Russia, but with bells and whistles.

      Direct democracy is rare beast. In it laws are directly voted by citizens on referendums.

    • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Its less democratic, but not completely undemocratic.

      It’s completely undemocratic. Public opinion has no influence on policy whatsoever. Most Americans are in favour of Medicare for all, of legal abortions, of rising taxes on corporations and the most rich people, and much much more. But study after study shows that public opinion has no influence on policy, as in, they’re not even correlated.

      • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I feel like that’s less of a problem with the way a representative democracy works, but rather with corruption and thus capitalism

        • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, I wasn’t referring to the concept of representative democracy itself, I was referring to the particular case of the US (though I’d extrapolate it to most liberal democracies in western countries)