• ck_@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    My personal gut feeling: the maintainer will just shoot this attempt down and close the PR.

    Happy to be proven wrong here though.

    • Anders429@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      dtolnay isn’t the only maintainer though. oli-obk is also a maintainer and is participating in the discussions on the PR.

      • ActuallyRuben@actuallyruben.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I don’t think oli-obk has any say in this as they stated the following:

        Because this crate is owned by dtolnay and he may do with it as he wishes. My personal opinions on the topic are irrelevant.

        Source

      • ck_@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Technically true, but he has two merge commits in last three years. Not sure that will still give him much of a pull.

    • miniu@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Author of the PR made it opt-out. I think it may be enough of the compromise for the maintainer.

    • TehPers@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Has dtolnay shown a strong sentiment towards having it be on always? I can’t imagine there’s much reason not to make it configurable.

      • d_k_bo@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        The precompiled implementation is the only supported way to use the macros that are published in serde_derive. If there is implementation work needed in some build tools to accommodate it, someone should feel free to do that work

        ~ dtolnay (source)

        That sounds like he doesn’t like to (re-)introduce any other options.

        • TehPers@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          That seems a bit concerning. At first I was under the impression the binary was compiled on the user’s machine, but once I saw that it’s distributed with serde I can see why people are upset.

          • d_k_bo@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            I was under the impression the binary was compiled on the user’s machine

            That’s how procedural macros used to and were intended to work.

        • Buttons@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          The precompiled implementation is the only supported way to use the macros that are published in serde_derive

          That statement is straight up gaslighting.

          The precompiled binary is only provided for one platform, Linux. Windows does not use a precompiled binary but compiles its own from the source. How can he claim it’s the “only supported way”, when for most platforms he is doing it another way? Also, the crate, throughout most of its life, has been doing it another way.