As universities and colleges turn to police to clear their campuses of protests over Israel’s assault on Gaza that continue to ripple across the nation, the response by law enforcement is under heightened scrutiny after thousands were arrested since mid-April.

Footage captured from the physical - and in some cases violent - confrontations between police and protesters reveals a gamut of tactics used to disperse demonstrators from occupied school buildings and take down on-campus encampments.

Civil rights groups have criticized what they say is an excessive police response to the protests as officers, clad in riot gear, swarm campuses and in some cases have deployed rubber bullets, chemical irritants and pepper balls to quell them. Law enforcement agencies say they were challenged with ensuring the First Amendment rights of protesters while enforcing the law and the rules of the universities and keeping everyone safe.

The wide range of police tactics seen on campuses nationwide reveal the disparities between police agencies in their training and understanding of the generally accepted best practices in dealing with protests and crowd control issues, law enforcement experts told CNN.

Still, the experts said, police were largely measured in their approach and showed restraint in using force – a direct result of lessons learned during the widespread protests after the police killing of George Floyd nearly four years ago. Those protests were bigger, fiercer and more sustained than prior demonstrations.

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Law enforcement agencies say they were challenged with ensuring the First Amendment rights of protesters while enforcing the law and the rules of the universities and keeping everyone safe.

    LOL like they give the slightest shit about First Amendment rights of protesters. The only reason they care, if at all, is because Qualified Immunity specifically does not apply if it can be shown that they violated someone’s constitutional rights during arrest or other interaction.

    I’m glad we are still at a point where our rights are some kind of guardrail for police, but I refuse to believe police care about them beyond maintaining QI.

  • nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s so weird to me that the police force just shows up to a university to enforce the university’s rules. ‘Hey officer, I have this cool club and some people are not abiding by the rules I made up! Please come enforce them!’

    Am I missing something? Is there something enshrined in law that grants universities that privilege or am I correct in thinking this is bullshit?

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Property owners get to set rules for use of their property.

      Anyone in violation (by say protesting said property owner,) is technically trespassing. Which is a generally very mild crime.

      It’s better for society, really, if cops- as barbaric and brutal as they are- do it. Otherwise you’d have private police being even more fucked up. (Pinkertons, union busting, comes to mind.)

    • cmhickman358@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      The lesson that they can do whetever the hell they feel like and like maybe on or two of them across the entire country might face something which appears like consequences but is actually a light slap on the wrist.