• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    They may not be to blame, but they are responsible.

    For instance if they knew this was coming down the pipeline as a requirement, this should have been in place on day one.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        If they wanted to make PlayStation networks 100% hard requirement for the game, that should have been there on day one. The enforcement should have been there. Even if the API servers were having issues the enforcement should have been there.

        The software’s behavior is the social contract with the user. If steam says a PlayStation network account is required, and you load the game and it’s only needed for cross play or it’s optional. That is the defacto contract. And that has existed for about 4 months.

        It’s entirely possible to buy the game, without seeing the PlayStation button. If you just click buy now, or get it from your wish list or whatever, you’re not presented with anything indicating PlayStation is required. So the common use case for a steam user, is to run the game, oh it needs this network That’s not cool refund. This program has broken that pattern.

        So yes it is entirely the developers fault, if this is a hard requirement it should always be hard requirement, not after 4 months. That is changing the lived gamer experience.