Mitch McConell says the quiet part out loud.

Exact full quote from CNN:

“People think, increasingly it appears, that we shouldn’t be doing this. Well, let me start by saying we haven’t lost a single American in this war,” McConnell said. “Most of the money that we spend related to Ukraine is actually spent in the US, replenishing weapons, more modern weapons. So it’s actually employing people here and improving our own military for what may lie ahead.”

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/4085063

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    11 months ago

    The parliament had no constitutional authority to vote to expell him without an impeachment hearing, which he never got. It was an illegal move.

    The referendum in Crimea is as legitimate as the acting president of Ukraine.

    • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      And tankies love it when America invades another country because that country didn’t democracy correctly.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I don’t support Russia invading, just so we’re clear. I can just see the rational progression of events from A to Z

        Why do you think Russia invaded? Cuz Russia bad? lol

        Ukraine is literally on Russia’s boarder, and Russia is not even a regional empire - it’s a jumped up gas station. Russia is vulnerable and knows it, so it lashes out like any animal backed into a corner. Now we have another forever war, this time in Europe.

        • kbotc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t support Russia invading, just so we’re clear.

          Then why are you using Russia’s talking points?

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Do you agree there is a difference between “reasons” and “justifications”?

            I think Russia’s reasons for invading are real and must acknowledged to end the war. I don’t think those reasons justify the war.

            Get it?

            • kbotc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              “I think the US’s reasons for invading Iraq are real and must be acknowledged to end the war.”

              Does that clarify what I’m talking about to you at all?

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                The US’s reasons for invading Iraq weren’t fucking real. They made it all up!

                Does that clarify what I’m talking about to you at all?

                • kbotc@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Yes, and that’s exactly the point I was making about Russia’s reasons. The NATO already had troops in all of the Baltics following the invasion of Crimea. (Look up Operation Atlantic Resolve) Every single US troop there was already closer to Moscow than any potential Ukrainian base could ever possibly hope to be.

                  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    You’re skipping some parts of the history. Before Operation Atlantic Resolve, there was the illegal removal of the previous anti-NATO president and the installation of a pro-NATO president, and that was the trigger for the invasion of Crimea and the illegal referendum to annex the territory in the first place. If you care to look, there’s a pretty clear through-line of tit-for-tat that keeps happening.