• VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It’s a lot more expensive than independent repairs (depending on how often you break or loose your device during that time, I guess), and if I read it correctly, spans a maximum of 36 months after purchase. Don’t think it’s that good a value for the average buyer.

    Edit: Also, do device batteries usually dip below their set threshold within 36 Months, let alone multiple times?

    • limerodOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Valid question. They set 79% as the threshold. Depending on your usage and environment factors it could dip once or twice in 2-3 years.

      But, it’s cool they include this as the new metric. Previously, according to the article it was mechanical failure only (whatever that means). With 5-7 years of updates a replacement in the 2nd/3rd year of your phone can increase its longevity a bit.

      • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I mean, it’s definitely better than not offering it at all, and if people use the service anyway, than it’s an added Bonus for them. I also do get that not everyone decides on such things due to the monetary value vs having it done independently, and might instead want it for the peace of mind.

        I still think that it wouldn’t be worth it for me personally.

    • limerodOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      0% Battery is below 79%. It’s eligible too!