• Arch is only the larval stage. When a Linuxite consumes enough CLI, they metamorphose into one of two adult forms: a Void user, or a NixOS user. As these two adult forms are incompatible, this is a rare case of species divergence within a life cycle. Even more oddly, like the axolotl, many Arch users never leave the larval stage, and continue living comfortably in their ecological niche.

        • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yeah, that comment leaves out the “I learned a lot from Arch, but don’t have the time to manage evertything anymore” crowd, which goes Ubuntu -> Arch -> Debian/Mint/Fedora

          • I discovered that EndeavourOS satisfied that for me, without me having to give up Arch. And snapper+btrfs-grub has eliminated any interest in messing about with the new line of immutable systems. The only tempting distro I might spend time in is Chimera Linux (link, b/c of an unfortunate naming conflict) which (a little hilariously) is an attempt to make a Linux distro that’s purely Gnu-free. Chimera also runs dinit instead of systemd, and that’s interesting.

            Anyway, there are a couple of options that let a user stay in Arch but make things less… fussy.

            • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              I gunked up my system with too much AUR, even with endeavourOS. NixOS might be a bit more suitable for my ADHD brain.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        3 months ago

        As someone who switched to nixos - eh. So much hacking to make dev stuff work really kills the magic that nixos is supposed to be :|

        • steersman2484@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yeah, it is a lot of initial work, but once you got your shell.nix or flake.nix in place it is really nice, to not have to deal with different dependencies and versions in different projects.

          But you can also archive the same on any distro with the nix package manager.

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            3 months ago

            except i want my computer to function for my needs without “a lot of initial work”

            • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              3 months ago

              It’s an investment for the next time you install on a new dev machine. After install, I will literally run a single command to return to the exact state of my dev environment.

                • 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Me personally, a lot. I work on 4 different rigs (inlcuding latops) and yes, for me, it does save time.

                • NostraDavid@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Probably not often, but as a Debian user, it’s a PITA to get back to where I was before I fucked up my system. Nix(OS) sounds like a future investment to me, just in case I ever fuck up and need to get back to where I was ASAP. Been there once already and it was NOT fun.

                  That was from a professional standpoint BTW, privately I’m still a dirty Windows pleb, because that’s what I’m most familiar with.

                  PS: I’m already using a dotfiles repo, which already saves me a ton of time in settings things up.

            • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              It’s definetly a distro for tinkerers. But so is arch and it’s way more stable for my tinkering than arch.

              Edit: nicer grammar

            • evranch@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              This is why I run Manjaro, which I never hear any love for here for some reason. It’s the rolling releases and cutting edge updates of Arch, but with the ease of use and reliability of Debian. Insert a bootable USB and have a fully functional system in a couple minutes.

              Manjaro just works, from gaming to development, and I’ve never been forced to play games to install a hardware driver or newer library that isn’t part of the release like with Debian or Ubuntu.

              Been using Linux for over 20 years and never seen a distro so trouble free.

              • brenticus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                The reason you don’t see a lot of love for Manjaro is because your experience isn’t quite typical. Manjaro is notorious for taking Arch and making it less stable. It’s mostly Arch with some defaults and software to make it easier to set up, but the few cases where it drifts from Arch tend to cause more issues than if you just used Arch directly.

                • BoneALisa@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Agreed, i had more issues on Manjaro than i ever did on raw Arch. The Manjaro team, at least during the time i used it, didnt seem very good at keeping things working. So many issues with bad packages, keys expiring, stuff like that.

                  Arch was a blessing.

                  However, NixOS has ascended me to heaven lol.

                • evranch@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Interesting, I’ve installed it on quite a few machines now, all with widely varying hardware. Aside from my development/gaming rig I’ve got a shop laptop which is used by various goons to view shop drawings and look up parts, one the ex-wife still hasn’t managed to break, one is my 9 year old daughter’s and another is a potato that runs my 3d printer (to be fair this one is fossilized and doesn’t get updates).

                  All are working great with no setup effort and no maintenance so I guess it’s a classic case of YMMV. I wouldn’t have used Arch for any of those use cases except maybe the 3d printer.

        • fl42v@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          There are good (usable) flake templates you can just nix flake init, tho

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well it’s a good thing this person mentioned it. I have never heard of whatever game changers is. I would have never heard it otherwise.

      • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I waited for this comment to be relevant for the entirety of the episode. As I closed it, I heard the word “inflation” and I had to bring the video back up to finally understand what you meant by this lmao

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    3 months ago

    I use mint, btw.

    (…Not really but it fits the joke the best. I have used it and it’s an excellent distro whether you are a beginner or just want something stable and full featured. )

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      3 months ago

      Mint is such a pragmatic distro. Honestly I admire people who are just happy with their Mint and don’t feel the need to distro hop to ever more esoteric package ecosystems just to feel alive

    • beirdobaggins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      I use Debian everywhere but if I need a Live Linux environment to recover files, clone a drive, wipe a drive, or really anything else I use ventoy and a Linux mint iso.

      • monsterpiece42
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        I work in a PC repair shop (mostly Windows stuff) and I do the same with Ventoy and Mint. I especially like it for gParted but have a variety of things I use on it.

  • phorq@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    Español
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Yeah, it’s obvious a jealous Manjaro user stole that dude’s sticker…

    Edit: almost forgot… I use arch btw…

  • sayitghoul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t see what the problem is with Arch Linux and why it gets so much flak. I am not a Linux expert by any measure, but I use EndeavourOS and find it really use to use (don’t ask me to install from scratch). Its extremely stable and I like the fact that it gets updated constantly.

    The only other distro I really liked is MX Linux. My main gripe was that I don’t want to reinstall every so many years. I want to set up an OS and just use it without worrying about it being a temporary thing. But maybe I’ll change my mind in the future.

    I’m not for or against any distro really, maybe except Ubuntu and its bloat. I just use what best suits me, which is the whole point of all the different distros.

    • Communist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 months ago

      Manjaro is truly the worst distro of all time and probably helps give arch a bad name

    • tubaruco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 months ago

      i think its just people taking the “i use arch btw” meme too seriously and thinking its bad to show or even use it all

    • 56!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t think this is an “Arch is bad” post, but rather a “Void is good post”. I think the sticker is remove because it’s not relevant to them anymore.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve used arch on one machine now, am a total noob to it, and I really like it. I see what people are raving about and I see no reason to shit on it. I don’t really care if 6 years ago some people were annoying about it

        • 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Faster, more stable, no systemd, supports musl and architectures not usually supported by most distros. It’s probably the most stable rolling release distro out there.

                • throwwyacc@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  What are the systemd bugs that are so bad? I kinda get the bloated comment, but I don’t really mind when it serves its purpose

                • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  I literally haven’t run into a single one in the whole time Arch has been using it.

                  (I installed Arch shortly before it switched to systemd and have been using it since without pause)

            • DickFiasco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              The main benefit is that when people get tired of distro flame wars, they can move on to init system flame wars.

              • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                I have no horse in this race, I don’t have strong feelings about it either way as long as it works. But I can’t help but notice that OP skipped replying to me.

                • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  OP said “bloated and full of bugs”.

                  I’ve been using Arch since shortly before they started using systemd and literally never ran into a systemd bug.

                  I have no clue at this point what “bloated” means. Maybe if everything works and you don’t have to hack up your own solution all the time, that’s “bloat”?

            • Yes. From their website:

              C library diversity

              Void Linux supports both the musl and GNU libc implementations, patching incompatible software when necessary and working with upstream developers to improve the correctness and portability of their projects.

            • 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yes, there are basically 2 builds for every architecture. One is glibc, the other is musl. I haven’t used the musl builds that much, just toyed with them a few times (mainly because of lack of software), but if you only use open source software that doesn’t specifically depend on the GNU toolchain, yes, you can daily drive it, no doubt there. And yes, it is faster than the glibc builds.

                • 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  The syntax is a bit different, but everything else, more or less the same. In fact, if you just wanna repackage a deb or an rpm, it’s even easier than in Arch, xbps-src can handle deb and rpm automatically, it detects dependencies and does repackaging on it’s own. You basically just have to feed it the deb/rpm file in a one liner, that’s it.

                  I should probably give an example. Here is the template file (they’re called templates in Void) for Viber. You basically just feed it the deb, do a vcopy (copy operation specific to xbps-src) and that’s it, everything else regarding the repackaging is done automatically by xbps-src.

            • 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              No, just bootup and general responsivness of the system. Software is still compiled by the ssme compilers used in other distros. Everything is not magically faster.

              Though on the musl build, yeah, it is faster. Trouble is, you can’t run glibc software on it. Through chroot, yeah, but natively, no.

            • 56!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago
              • The package manager is extremely fast
              • The lack of systemd reduces startup time
              • The musl libc marginally speeds up programs
          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Interesting. I will have to try it some time. I just know on my raspberry pi 5, out of the few OSes I could get to run on it, Arch was the fastest and smoothest running, and gets updates all the time. All this, even though rpi5 is not even officially supported yet!

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s a bit tounge in cheek, nobody actually got mad at the arch namedropping. More like “I’m a platinum level player in LoL”. Lol.

      • ByteWelder@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        The existence of ArchWiki and the Arch User Respository (AUR). And rolling releases, if that’s your thing.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Basically just the fact that it’s very lightweight, I was able to install it on an rpi5 (not officially supported), install only what I needed, and was able to resolve all the issues I had for my niche use-case.

        There is a quite noticeable difference in how snappy it feels versus the official rpi OS. Arch runs way zippier on it. Those devices are a little limited hardware-wise so it makes a big difference in what it feels like to use that system.

        I also like knowing that the updates flowing in so quickly, I get the latest fixes and new features before I would on any of the other distros I’ve used. I have always been a little scared of rolling releases but over the last couple months I haven’t seen any breakages yet so fingers crossed! A lot of people have tried to tell me rolling release can be solid, but I was skeptical.

        • bort@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          snappy it feels versus the official rpi OS

          I blame the desktop manager. Once I ditched the default von on the pi, and replaced it with standard gnome, the pi became almost as snappy as my regular notebook.

          in general: standard debian should be exactly as light-weight as arch.

  • MyNamesNotRobert@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I couldn’t figure out how to make the wifi on my Debian machine reliable so I replaced the default wifi manager front-end and backend with iwctl, the same thing Arch uses by default. It seems to be working but now I have an unholy abomination of Debian spliced with Arch DNA.