The Acolyte had the potential to be the best Star Wars series yet, but as the preview shows, it follows one terrible series trend.

  • lolcatnip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I was never bothered by the visual quality in The Mandalorian or Ahsoka, so I guess I have nothing to worry about.

  • essell@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Save you a click.

    Disney is bad because They don’t give streaming TV the same money as films So the special effects are not as good and starwars series look cheap

    • inkican@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      By consistently contributing to the sub only ‘to save people a click’ rather than contributing interesting Links of your own, I find you in violation of rules one and three.

      No one disagrees that internet news articles can do better in terms of quality and content. However by only contributing what you dislike as opposed to contributing what you do like, you’re coming across as entitled and disrespectful to the spirit of the community.

      I give you two hours to find and post a scifi article or item for us to talk about or face a one week ban.

      • HenchmanNumber3@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        However by only contributing what you dislike as opposed to contributing what you do like, you’re coming across as entitled and disrespectful to the spirit of the community.

        This is an odd perspective. They’re literally contributing by fixing what they dislike and preventing others from having to waste time. They don’t come across as entitled. They come across as helpful and respecting the time and attention spans of the community.

      • Chuymatt@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ok, are we not seeing the at that title is both hyperbolic and click-bait? If it was an in depth, thoughtful article, it’d be a different thing. Is anyone surprised a for profit company is not spent g capital on a streaming program over movies, which are inarguably more profitable.

        This seems a rather impressively outsized a reaction for a common push back against click-bait articles thing.

        Have fun, kid.

  • Pronell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Visual Fidelity, for those who are curious.

    Doesn’t bother me. I have HD, don’t bother with 4k, and heck I’d see better if I wore glasses in my living room.