suspicious_eye@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-24 months agoDid you ever think that maybe all VPN services are actually secretly owned/funded by governments and that they are only giving you a false illusion of privacy?message-squaremessage-square128fedilinkarrow-up1303
arrow-up1303message-squareDid you ever think that maybe all VPN services are actually secretly owned/funded by governments and that they are only giving you a false illusion of privacy?suspicious_eye@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-24 months agomessage-square128fedilink
minus-squareredcalcium@lemmy.institutelinkfedilinkarrow-up13·4 months agoLucky you to be able to trust your ISP. Mine injects ads whenever they can, even hijack DNS and redirect invalid/blocked domains to a page full of ads.
minus-squareParagone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoIn correct law, that’d be copyright-violation committed by your ISP: IF the website you hit didn’t authorize your ISP to create a derivative-work, THEN your ISP adulterating it should be considered commercial-copyright-violation, and stomped by the copyright-lobby. Notice how this has been going-on for decades, and the copyright-lobby … ignores it, to stomp-on individuals only… Interesting evidence of “rule of ‘law’”, isn’t it?
Lucky you to be able to trust your ISP. Mine injects ads whenever they can, even hijack DNS and redirect invalid/blocked domains to a page full of ads.
In correct law, that’d be copyright-violation committed by your ISP:
IF the website you hit didn’t authorize your ISP to create a derivative-work,
THEN your ISP adulterating it should be considered commercial-copyright-violation, and stomped by the copyright-lobby.
Notice how this has been going-on for decades, and the copyright-lobby … ignores it, to stomp-on individuals only…
Interesting evidence of “rule of ‘law’”, isn’t it?