• grte@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    5 months ago

    Respect to all the Bloc MPs who voted yea. Those guys make out like bandits under the current system.

      • grte@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Right, I remember now someone shared that a few days ago. Well, I suppose that’s less impressive then. And way less impressive on the part of the HoC to not pass something basic like improved voting access.

        • SamuelRJankis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          I don’t think that is a accurate portrayal of the motion.

          https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-electoral-reform-1.7101929

          The House of Commons will vote next week on Motion 86. Sponsored by NDP MP Lisa Marie Barron, the motion calls on the federal government to establish a citizens assembly to "determine if electoral reform is recommended for Canada, and, if so, recommend specific measures that would foster a healthier democracy

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    5 months ago

    Like, technically, but clearly the CPC wanted it dead. The LPC was also rather divided but mostly supported it.

    My guy voted “Yea” though, so they’re cool.

    • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m oddly proud of BC, way to get a majority there guys.

      But major kudos to Quebec, your MP’s are actually listening (here), but also NWT, Nova Scotia, Nunavut, PWI, and the Yukon.

      As is tradition though, the prairies let us down.

    • doylio@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      The CPC are probably convinced the only way they can achieve a majority under Poilievre is if they get a false majority through a lucky roll of FPTP. In 2015 they were all upset that the LPC got a majority with only 39% of votes

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        FPTP has generally benefitted the LPC. I remember an analysis I read about the time they were “promising” election reform that said in close races, over 60% of the time the Liberals ended up with the election. Wish I could still find it, my google-fu is failing me tonight.

        Besides, this bill had nothing to do with that. It wasn’t going to fix anything even if it had passed.

    • Franklin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah I really hope that we gain traction for this within our lifetimes because I think it will be the first step in helping our democracy reflect the will of the people

  • gruvn@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Can someone explain how the PM has both a yea and nay vote? I’m genuinely confused.

  • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Seems wrong that the elected people get to decide if we change how they get elected. Once they have their seat they can fight to keep it against electoral change.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    If anyone was wondering about the Conservatives:

    Ben Lobb (Huron-Bruce), John Nater (Perth-Wellington), Alex Ruff (Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound)

    Bernard Généreux (Montmagny—L’Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup) also had his vote marked updated, so maybe he flip-flopped.

    This doc has the worst format, BTW.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    This bill was not going to achieve anything anyway. It wasn’t addressing FPTP in any way.