No I can’t, Wikipedia only uses news articles as sources.
Not only is it not a news article, the person the Wikipedia entry is on is the source of the info, which is a big no-no on Wikipedia.
So no, I can’t, because I understand how Wikipedia works. If there is a news article referencing him being a founder, that’s a different story, but this is his personal Twitter.
Hey, if Wikipedia let people start updating information based on good sources, they’d loose the reputation for being unreliable they’ve worked so hard to cultivate
Lmao the fact that a single missed autocorrect is more relevant to you than the long history of noted credibility issues on Wikipedia is telling about your intelligence.
No I can’t, Wikipedia only uses news articles as sources.
Not only is it not a news article, the person the Wikipedia entry is on is the source of the info, which is a big no-no on Wikipedia.
So no, I can’t, because I understand how Wikipedia works. If there is a news article referencing him being a founder, that’s a different story, but this is his personal Twitter.
the more you know!
Hey, if Wikipedia let people start updating information based on good sources, they’d loose the reputation for being unreliable they’ve worked so hard to cultivate
*lose
More reliable than you apparently.
Sorry that I don’t bother to proofread comments to see how my phone decided to fuck them up
So yeah… More reliable than someone who doesn’t visually spell-check.
Thanks for proving my point.
Lmao the fact that a single missed autocorrect is more relevant to you than the long history of noted credibility issues on Wikipedia is telling about your intelligence.
It doesn’t matter to me at all that you are obviously an idiot.
Go shove it up your ass, shit eater