• Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yup you all voted to let the rich people keep all their money, dont come skulking around with your hat out talking about how we have to buckle down.

      10 people have all the money, it should not be hard for you configure out who to go after if you need money, if your answer is anybody other than those people fuck off.

  • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    “The problem for the US is the starting point; every round of fiscal stimulus brings the US one step closer to debt unsustainability,” JPMorgan strategist Michael Cembalest said. “However, we’re accustomed to deteriorating US government finances with limited consequences for investors, and one day that may change (the boiling frog analogy),” Cembalest added.

    Notice how he doesn’t mention the bloated military budget, only ‘stimulus’. I do not think ‘debt’ is the issue that will end up killing the U.S., as long as the Dollar is the reserve currency it can keep printing as much it wants.

    • hottari@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      The dollar won’t be a reserve currency for long now that BRICS is getting stronger and eventually China will topple the US as the foremost superpower. It’s already written into the future as hegemonies decline, fall and are replaced.

    • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      yea also, U.S. is like the only country which doesn’t need to worry about balance of payments. You see this with how every other country’s current account deficit is shown in U.S. Dollars instead of the local currency.

      of course, there are very good reasons to not have a current account deficit. self reliance and all (plus the dollar slowly losing its status) kim-drip

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s true that they can just print money here, but this leads to secondary effects that the article touches on. Specifically, increased currency volume tends to mean devaluation leading to private lenders to tighten up.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          Right, as far as public spending goes there isn’t really a problem. They can print to an infinite amount because the debt is in their own currency, and as long as you print the currency, you can print however much you want. There’s never going to be a default because the fed can just create more credit. The government can always pay its debt by simply printing the money.

          The problem for the US economy lies with private debt that is leading to a default. Creditors are tightening their lending which is leading VC funded businesses to crash. Meanwhile, individuals become increasingly unable to service their debts, we’re seeing them being forced to forfeit their property. Private banks that are holding debt also end up with bad debt as a result. This sort of dynamic is precisely what we saw leading up to the 2008 crisis. We’re now seeing similar things happening, but on a much bigger scale.

  • hottari@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    The productivity from AI will save the US from this debt problem. /s but not /s.

  • aew360@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    The last President with a balanced budget was Clinton. If Republicans cared about a balanced budget so much, why aren’t they asking him how he did it?

  • lntl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    can’t they just print the money? i don’t get why debt is a problem for this case

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      The article gives a few reasons, one being that private lenders tend to tighten up when inflation is rising because they realize that businesses won’t be able to grow at a sufficient rate for them to make a return.

    • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      They are against using deficit to improve productive forces or provide for welfare. See how they mentioned mandatory spending (referring to social security).

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    A boiling frog situation is one in which people fail to act on a potential problem that grows over time, causing it to become more severe until it eventually bubbles over.

    It’s an issue that has worried economists for years, and calls for something to change have grown louder as the government continues to borrow at record volumes.

    The debt picture will only worsen in the coming years, according to the Congressional Budget Office, which estimates that the US’s entitlement spending, mandatory spending, and net interest payments on the debt will exceed the government’s total revenue by the early 2030s.

    “The problem for the US is the starting point; every round of fiscal stimulus brings the US one step closer to debt unsustainability,” JPMorgan strategist Michael Cembalest said.

    “However, we’re accustomed to deteriorating US government finances with limited consequences for investors, and one day that may change (the boiling frog analogy),” Cembalest added.

    Risks of a recession are still alive this year, Cembalest warned, though he noted that a coming downturn would likely be mild.


    The original article contains 384 words, the summary contains 175 words. Saved 54%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!