Microsoft are looking at putting datacenters under the ocean, which sounds like a really good idea to cool them but I can’t help but think a couple decades from now it’s going to start causing us problems

  • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Onshore, wind turbines sprout from farmers’ rolling fields and solar panels adorn roofs of centuries-old homes, generating more than enough electricity to supply the islands’ 10,000 residents with 100 percent renewable energy. A cable from the Orkney Island grid sends electricity to the datacenter, which requires just under a quarter of a megawatt of power when operating at full capacity.

    It’s still pretty darn clean.

    • CaptainAniki@lemmy.flight-crew.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not clean at all. You’re burying disposable hardware into extremely corrosive salt water and then throwing away the whole thing when it fails. What the fuck is green about that?

      • grue@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        All hardware is “disposable” in the sense that it becomes obsolete after a few years, and the electricity to keep using it costs more than replacing it with new hardware with better performance per watt.

        Maybe once Moore’s law is finally dead and buried that’ll stop being the case, but it hasn’t happened quite yet.

        • CaptainAniki@lemmy.flight-crew.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          But we recycle e-waste. You’re not recycling shit that’s been corroded by the ocean. It’s ruined, not just obsolete. We already have fully-renewable data-centers. This just makes more problems than it solves which is why there’s been no update to this article from 2018.