• Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s similar to Ukraine, they don’t want peace unless it means getting all their land back. You can literally apply the same logic and say Ukraine can stop the war if they just agree to peace today.

    • duffman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      If Ukraine has been firing rockets into Russia, the Russian invasion would have been justified.

    • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Somewhat similar, but the bottom line is Ukraine is a recognized nation with international backing. Russia attacked them to gain territory. If Ukraine can beat this round of Russian aggression they get to remain a state and regain their lost lands. If they can’t beat the Russians back then it is an entirely different scenario. As much as I want to see them succeed there is a chance they could fail.

      Finland also lost a huge chunk of territory to Russia back in the 1940s. They recognized they couldn’t beat back the Russians, struck a deal and moved on. They are now arguably better off than if the choose to continue the fight.

      Gaza is not a state, the Palestinians had multiple a chances for statehood and a shot at peaceful prosperity. Instead they choose to continue to fight and commit terrorism. The current state of total war between Israel and Hamas are the consequence of their actions.

    • DarkGamer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Ukraine has a viable path to military victory, Palestine does not. Israel was attacked and is counter attacking in defense, Russia invaded Ukraine under obvious bullshit pretext as a land grab. Your bias is obvious if you can’t see the difference.