I had someone steel this and change “butts” to “Christian” and weirdly enough, lengthen my skirt. Kept the flame boots, but no short skirts.

  • irmoz
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The mentioned “platform” implies it is acceptable by allowing it

    • CaptainEffort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I disagree. Something being allowed doesn’t mean it’s acceptable.

      I mean there are loads of bigoted comments all over Twitter and Facebook, and I wouldn’t call any of those “acceptable” despite technically being allowed.

      • irmoz
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why would you allow unacceptable content? That’s an implicit endorsement.

        • CaptainEffort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Lmao what? Saying that people should be allowed to speak their minds isn’t the same as agreeing with everything everyone has to say.

          Honestly, you assuming that it’s an “endorsement” speaks much more to your own issues than anything else. Maybe learn that life isn’t so binary - that things can be a little more nuanced.

          • irmoz
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I think you might have things backwards. The way I see it, I’m the one trying to add shades of grey to a world you are describing as black and white. Either they agree, or they don’t, that’s why you say. I say no, it’s more complicated than that. And yet, you say this is somehow reducing to a binary. Maybe I’m taking crazy pills. You tell me.

            • CaptainEffort@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Either they agree or they don’t

              That’s not at all what I’m saying. I’m actually saying the opposite. Whether anyone agrees with anyone else is entirely irrelevant to my point.

              I’m saying that people are allowed to say whatever they want, and that them being allowed to do so doesn’t mean that what they’re saying is actually acceptable.

              For example, someone can go on Twitter and have a full blown racist rant. They’re allowed to do that. But that doesn’t mean that what they did is acceptable.

              You’re saying that if something is allowed, it must be acceptable. That it being allowed in the first place somehow implies an endorsement of the behavior. That’s pretty much the definition of black and white thinking.

              • irmoz
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                If it were unacceptable behaviour, it wouldn’t be allowed.

                • CaptainEffort@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Yes it would be. That’s how free speech works. If you think blatantly racist rants are generally accepted, you’re delusional.