I had someone steel this and change “butts” to “Christian” and weirdly enough, lengthen my skirt. Kept the flame boots, but no short skirts.

  • irmoz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think you might have things backwards. The way I see it, I’m the one trying to add shades of grey to a world you are describing as black and white. Either they agree, or they don’t, that’s why you say. I say no, it’s more complicated than that. And yet, you say this is somehow reducing to a binary. Maybe I’m taking crazy pills. You tell me.

    • CaptainEffort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Either they agree or they don’t

      That’s not at all what I’m saying. I’m actually saying the opposite. Whether anyone agrees with anyone else is entirely irrelevant to my point.

      I’m saying that people are allowed to say whatever they want, and that them being allowed to do so doesn’t mean that what they’re saying is actually acceptable.

      For example, someone can go on Twitter and have a full blown racist rant. They’re allowed to do that. But that doesn’t mean that what they did is acceptable.

      You’re saying that if something is allowed, it must be acceptable. That it being allowed in the first place somehow implies an endorsement of the behavior. That’s pretty much the definition of black and white thinking.

      • irmoz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        If it were unacceptable behaviour, it wouldn’t be allowed.

        • CaptainEffort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yes it would be. That’s how free speech works. If you think blatantly racist rants are generally accepted, you’re delusional.

            • CaptainEffort@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Because things aren’t so black and white. Something not being acceptable doesn’t always mean it should straight up be outlawed. That’s not how the world works. People do socially unacceptable shit all the time and aren’t violating any laws by doing them.

              • irmoz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                You’re conflating law and morality.

                • CaptainEffort@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  That’s literally what you’re doing by saying that anything unacceptable shouldn’t be allowed. Just because something is acceptable, that doesn’t mean it isn’t allowed. Because laws and morality aren’t always a perfect 1:1.

                  • irmoz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    I never mentioned laws. You did. Laws are irrelevant to this discussion. Precisely because laws and morality are not the same thing. We’re talking about rules of conduct on a platform.