Google CEO Sundar Pichai sent a 1,200-word memo to his global workforce after pro-Palestinian staffers stormed offices in New York, Seattle and Sunnyvale, Calif.
Well, they did leave…by force. But that still leaves Google supplementing genocide and them out of job. Ideally, they’d still have a job, and Google would uphold the human right to life. But Pichai sidesteps that contention altogether by decree: “Don’t talk about it!”
In a Marxist country, you’d be put in prison for disagreeing.
In a capitalist country where life is cheap, you’ll lose your livelihood refusing to contribute to murder on an industrial scale. So, trade-offs, I guess.
But that still leaves Google supplementing genocide and them out of job
America doesn’t see it as genocide. Neither does Google. Sometimes it’s a tough pill to swallow but not everyone agrees it’s a genocide. I don’t. The only people I see being genocide are the Jews which is why Gaza is being invaded.
Ideally they’d do their job. They’re not a charity. Pichai did the right thing. Their customer is buying their products. The employees can work or be fired. That’s their options.
Well, I guess it’s better that Google enable mass murder than employees oppose it, according to your logic.
What’s funny is that after the atrocities of WWII, there were all these books written about “How could they do that?!” Well, if they thought like you, it’s pretty clear: it was always warranted. The only thing that really mattered was whether people did their jobs.
Since the murders took place in Palestine, wouldn’t it fall under Palestinian law? In that case, Israel is defying the law by invoking the death penalty without the consent of the President.
Otherwise any country can attack any country as long as they say “this murder isn’t illegal under my own laws so it’s ok”.
Either way, it doesn’t matter since your previous comment invokes the US Government, so you set your own goalpost on that one there bud.
Well, they did leave…by force. But that still leaves Google supplementing genocide and them out of job. Ideally, they’d still have a job, and Google would uphold the human right to life. But Pichai sidesteps that contention altogether by decree: “Don’t talk about it!”
In a capitalist country where life is cheap, you’ll lose your livelihood refusing to contribute to murder on an industrial scale. So, trade-offs, I guess.
America doesn’t see it as genocide. Neither does Google. Sometimes it’s a tough pill to swallow but not everyone agrees it’s a genocide. I don’t. The only people I see being genocide are the Jews which is why Gaza is being invaded.
Ideally they’d do their job. They’re not a charity. Pichai did the right thing. Their customer is buying their products. The employees can work or be fired. That’s their options.
Well, I guess it’s better that Google enable mass murder than employees oppose it, according to your logic.
What’s funny is that after the atrocities of WWII, there were all these books written about “How could they do that?!” Well, if they thought like you, it’s pretty clear: it was always warranted. The only thing that really mattered was whether people did their jobs.
There is no mass murder going on. You’re seeing something most people don’t see.
How many murders in a mass murder?
The answer is 3. If Israel has killed more than 3 Palestinian civilians, it’s mass murder according to US law.
Just because the current leadership won’t come out and say it doesn’t mean it isn’t happening.
The US government does not agree with you.
The US Government also has no morals, so I’m ok with that. They’re not always right.
At least US law agrees with me: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/mass-murder-united-states
Guess you didn’t read the title. In the United states.
Murder is an illegal killing and what is Israel is doing isn’t murder under the law.
Which law? Israel’s or Palestines?
Since the murders took place in Palestine, wouldn’t it fall under Palestinian law? In that case, Israel is defying the law by invoking the death penalty without the consent of the President.
Otherwise any country can attack any country as long as they say “this murder isn’t illegal under my own laws so it’s ok”.
Either way, it doesn’t matter since your previous comment invokes the US Government, so you set your own goalpost on that one there bud.