The SCOTUS needs to take this or a case like it.

  • BobaFuttbucker
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    You are correct, so why restrict which bathroom they can use on this basis?

    Furthermore, why would you want the SC to make this decision for them? Isn’t the conservative stance toward less government interference in citizens’ lives rather than more? Doesn’t restricting bathroom choice reduce personal freedom?

    Why don’t you try to make an on-topic argument instead of just raging against anons challenging your view?

    • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Interesting. You think you know my views. I’ve yet to state them other than scotus need to address the issue.

      • BobaFuttbucker
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        I keep inviting you to share your views. You alone have the power to rectify this situation.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              From the article.

              At issue was whether either the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which says that the laws apply equally to everyone, or Title IX, the federal law that prohibits sex discrimination in education, protects transgender students in that context. The court’s decision not to intervene means that litigation in lower courts nationwide will continue, with judges reaching differing conclusions. The Supreme Court is likely to weigh in on the issue at some point.

              Only SCOTUS can clarify.

              • BobaFuttbucker
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Which part is unclear? Within the given context what about the 14th amendment and Title IX conflicts?

                You can not discriminate on the basis of sex, AND apply that equally to everyone, so what’s the problem?

                • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Gender and sex are not the same thing. Sounds like you agree with Indiana that biological men should use the male bathrooms since their sex is male.

                  • BobaFuttbucker
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    I said not discriminate, and to not discriminate equally, so you must be jumping through mad hoops to get to that conclusion.