The SCOTUS needs to take this or a case like it.

  • BobaFuttbucker
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    I keep inviting you to share your views. You alone have the power to rectify this situation.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          From the article.

          At issue was whether either the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which says that the laws apply equally to everyone, or Title IX, the federal law that prohibits sex discrimination in education, protects transgender students in that context. The court’s decision not to intervene means that litigation in lower courts nationwide will continue, with judges reaching differing conclusions. The Supreme Court is likely to weigh in on the issue at some point.

          Only SCOTUS can clarify.

          • BobaFuttbucker
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Which part is unclear? Within the given context what about the 14th amendment and Title IX conflicts?

            You can not discriminate on the basis of sex, AND apply that equally to everyone, so what’s the problem?

            • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Gender and sex are not the same thing. Sounds like you agree with Indiana that biological men should use the male bathrooms since their sex is male.

              • BobaFuttbucker
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                6 months ago

                I said not discriminate, and to not discriminate equally, so you must be jumping through mad hoops to get to that conclusion.