‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says::Pressure grows on artificial intelligence firms over the content used to train their products

  • lolcatnip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t understand why people are defending AI companies

    Because it’s not just big companies that are affected; it’s the technology itself. People saying you can’t train a model on copyrighted works are essentially saying nobody can develop those kinds of models at all. A lot of people here are naturally opposed to the idea that the development of any useful technology should be effectively illegal.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is frankly very simple.

      • If the AI is trained on copyrighted material and doesn’t pay for it, then the model should be freely available for everyone to use.

      • If the AI is trained on copyrighted material and pays a license for it, then the company can charge people for using the model.

      If information should be free and copyright is stifling, then OpenAI shouldn’t be able to charge for access. If information is valuable and should be paid for, then OpenAI should have paid for the training material.

      OpenAI is trying to have it both ways. They don’t want to pay for information, but they want to charge for information. They can’t have one without the either.

    • BURN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      You can make these models just fine using licensed data. So can any hobbyist.

      You just can’t steal other people’s creations to make your models.

      • lolcatnip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        Of course it sounds bad when you using the word “steal”, but I’m far from convinced that training is theft, and using inflammatory language just makes me less inclined to listen to what you have to say.

        • BURN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 months ago

          Training is theft imo. You have to scrape and store the training data, which amounts to copyright violation based on replication. It’s an incredibly simple concept. The model isn’t the problem here, the training data is.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      I am not saying you can’t train on copyrighted works at all, I am saying you can’t train on copyrighted works without permission. There are fair use exemptions for copyright, but training AI shouldn’t apply. AI companies will have to acknowledge this and get permission (probably by paying money) before incorporating content into their models. They’ll be able to afford it.

      • lolcatnip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        What if I do it myself? Do I still need to get permission? And if so, why should I?

        I don’t believe the legality of doing something should depend on who’s doing it.

        • BURN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yes you would need permission. Just because you’re a hobbyist doesn’t mean you’re exempt from needing to follow the rules.

          As soon as it goes beyond a completely offline, personal, non-replicatible project, it should be subject to the same copyright laws.

          If you purely create a data agnostic AI model and share the code, there’s no problem, as you’re not profiting off of the training data. If you create an AI model that’s available for others to use, then you’d need to have the licensing rights to all of the training data.