• ToastyMedic
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 months ago

    Well, not quite. It’s more akin to if the union was pushed back and was limited to new-england.

    The PRC is the confederate equivalent, as they weren’t the original legal government unlike Taiwan, which legally is the heir of the ROC.

    Also one of these states is an authoritarian piece of shit, and it’s definitely not Taiwan.

    • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      9 months ago

      The PRC is the confederate equivalent, as they weren’t the original legal government unlike Taiwan, which legally is the heir of the ROC.

      The left wing of the KMT split from Chiang’s KMT in 1948 to form the Revolutionary Committee of the KMT. It was headed by a senior KMT General and Song Ching Ling the widow of Sun Yat Sen. Madam Song would later serve as a Vice President of the People’s Republic of China and the Revolutionary Committee of the KMT holds seats in the National People’s Congress to this day.

      If you even look at the history of the KMT, you’d see that it’s incredibly prone to factionalism, including a period during the First United Front where the CPC agreed to join the KMT as a wing to fight the Warlords but left after the KMT stabbed it in the back during the Shanghai Purges.

      Legally, the PRC is recognized by the UN as the sole representative of China under General Assembly Resolution 2758 and the overwhelming majority of the world’s nation’s recognize that there is only one China and that China is the PRC.

      Cope and seethe.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The PRC is the confederate equivalent, as they weren’t the original legal government unlike Taiwan, which legally is the heir of the ROC.

      Going by paper legality argument, ROC is also illegal because it wrested power from Qing. Which conquered China from Ming, which toppled Yuan, and going fast forward to Han, Qing, Zhao and Shang, neither of them also risen peacefully.

      • ToastyMedic
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Ahhh, Chinese history. Breaking every 400-500 years into total chaos, and someone new fixes it so the cycle repeated.

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Does it looks like that to you? I would say they have unparallelled cultural and civilisational continuity rarily seen in any other place. And feudal empires falling is not the gotcha you think it is, especially when you look at the absolute clusterfuck in Europe (or many other places too).

          Also nice deflection.

          • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            33
            ·
            9 months ago

            Every great empire in human civilization has fallen. China is the only one to have fallen and then gotten back up multiple times.

            Like yeah China will probably fall again in the future, but the great grandchildren of everyone on this site will be long dead by then. Contrast that with America, which has had hegemony only since 1945 and already looks like it’s in terminal decline.

            • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              22
              ·
              9 months ago

              Contrast that with America, which has had hegemony only since 1945 and already looks like it’s in terminal decline.

              They’ve lasted less than the British! The BRITISH!

          • ToastyMedic
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            You made your point dating to the shang, and I dont disagree. Even more, you’re right, feudal empires falling isn’t a gotcha.

            So what about a modern state being violently overthrown? Or is this different because one violent, illegiment warlord championed “the people”, and proceeded to starve 200* million of them after taking power?

            Which one of these two states still maintains democratic or republican ideals for the people, a reminder that real Legitimacy lay with the people.

            Sorry. Just a measley 50 million people mb. Still the worst famine in history. And 100% preventable.

            • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              32
              ·
              9 months ago

              Modern state is when you fund yourself off of opium profits, you appoint your gangster relatives to be in charge of state finances, your officials occasionally run off to form collaborationist governments with Imperial Japan, and you’re so corrupt and incompetent that your own allies are disgusted by you and you lose a war against your own people despite the military and financial backing of the most powerful country in the world.

              Democratic and republican ideals is when you retreat to an island because you got your ass handed to you and then perpetrate the White Terror against your people for 40 years.

            • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              You made your point dating to the shang, and I dont disagree.

              Well, as i read about the history of China, previous entity of Xia apparently didn’t conquered anyone and even if they did, we don’t know, written history of China start from the late Shang period.

              About the rest Tankiedesantski answered you about the “republican ideas” of ROC, i can only add that even if you deflect yet again to “real Legitimacy lay with the people” there is nothing more really legitimate by the people than popular revolution which led to the state being supported by 90% of population.

    • KurtVonnegut [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      one of these states is an authoritarian piece of shit, and it’s definitely not Taiwan.

      Tell that to the indigenous people of Taiwan. I bet they’d love to hear about how their genocide was “non-authoritarian”.