Not that it is impossible, but could we please stop spreading rumors, and using gay as an insult to ridicule people, I know that it is more about highlighting the hypocrisy of right wing influencers, but this censored version is fishy, like why refresh the page to get the stream to resume, he could be hacked. If he is gay, good for him. but this video is weak proof that he himself streamed it and wasn’t hacked.
Edit: all evidence points to a hack. multiple sped up gay porn clips with no consistent theme playing back to back with a consistent watermark of a hacker’s telegram channel, without any sign of someone browsing through them, a stream that only started after the official stream had ended, all point to a hack. don’t let your disgust of the person blind you to the evidence, have some critical thinking, and thanks for the down votes.
Seriously? He was masturbating to gay porn, did they hack his brain too? And why would the so called hacker just put gay porn on? You easily could do so much worse (for him, nothing wrong with gay porn), and also steal and leak any info on the computer.
Do you not realise you’re making stuff up in a try to defend a nazi? Get fucked, you’re a dumb and shitty person.
I couldn’t see him mastrubating to anything in this censored video, even in this cut video https://x.com/vhs_archive/status/1791531138118222205 there wasn’t a mention of him being recorded masturbating, all I see is a rainbow flag with big red censored typography on top. I couldn’t find the uncut video so unless you have the raw footage, I prefer to ere on the side of caution. maybe be they should have posted the video to xhamster instead to twitter censorship.
Did you see the video? It’s clearly a hack, like it doesn’t show someone browsing through and finding a porn to watch, it is just instant barrage of different clips. And no video/sound/indication that he was jerking it.
This is mob mentality!! Think for yourself, seek evidence.
Remember kids when they use “but” in the sentence, ignore everything said before the but in that sentence. This comment uses “but” like this twice and following the “but” rule youll see the commenter is straight up just apologizing for nazi nick fuentes.
I don’t apologize for nazi’s, if he really is gay than I should sympathize with the mental state he is living under, being torn between to extreme identities, He must have pushed himself so hard to conform to the heterosexual norm that he ended up on the extreme side of conservatism and toxic heteronomative expectations. What I am saying saying, is he is in desperate need for mental help.
That’s an odd thing to say. They might just be adding some nuance to their analysis. If I used “but” as a conjunction in the conclusion of my thesis, does that mean it was only a paragraph long?
Yeah, it seems to escape far too many people that him being a Nazi doesn’t suddenly make gay bashing ok.
Ridicule him for being a hypocrite? Sure. Call him a piece of shit or even punch him for being a Nazi? Abso-fucking-lutely!
Berate him for being gay, or perpetuate the idea that all homophobes are really just closeted gays though? Not fucking ok.
Not because of his feelings, but because of all of the gay people, closeted or otherwise, who see people still using gay as an insult or thinking that most/all those who abuse gay people are actually gay themselves (a twisted form of victim blaming), and realise that it isn’t just Nazis who are hypocrites, but so called allies, too.
Don’t use bigotry* to fight bigots, it shouldn’t need saying…
*And no, calling someone a Nazi, or a TERF, or cis, or white, isn’t bigotry. Basically don’t punch down, which again, shouldn’t need saying.
Not that it is impossible, but could we please stop spreading rumors, and using gay as an insult to ridicule people, I know that it is more about highlighting the hypocrisy of right wing influencers, but this censored version is fishy, like why refresh the page to get the stream to resume, he could be hacked. If he is gay, good for him. but this video is weak proof that he himself streamed it and wasn’t hacked.
Edit: all evidence points to a hack. multiple sped up gay porn clips with no consistent theme playing back to back with a consistent watermark of a hacker’s telegram channel, without any sign of someone browsing through them, a stream that only started after the official stream had ended, all point to a hack. don’t let your disgust of the person blind you to the evidence, have some critical thinking, and thanks for the down votes.
Seriously? He was masturbating to gay porn, did they hack his brain too? And why would the so called hacker just put gay porn on? You easily could do so much worse (for him, nothing wrong with gay porn), and also steal and leak any info on the computer.
Do you not realise you’re making stuff up in a try to defend a nazi? Get fucked, you’re a dumb and shitty person.
I couldn’t see him mastrubating to anything in this censored video, even in this cut video https://x.com/vhs_archive/status/1791531138118222205 there wasn’t a mention of him being recorded masturbating, all I see is a rainbow flag with big red censored typography on top. I couldn’t find the uncut video so unless you have the raw footage, I prefer to ere on the side of caution. maybe be they should have posted the video to xhamster instead to twitter censorship.
this is just misinformation to a T. where did you see or hear of this?
Did you see the video? It’s clearly a hack, like it doesn’t show someone browsing through and finding a porn to watch, it is just instant barrage of different clips. And no video/sound/indication that he was jerking it.
This is mob mentality!! Think for yourself, seek evidence.
Remember kids when they use “but” in the sentence, ignore everything said before the but in that sentence. This comment uses “but” like this twice and following the “but” rule youll see the commenter is straight up just apologizing for nazi nick fuentes.
I don’t apologize for nazi’s, if he really is gay than I should sympathize with the mental state he is living under, being torn between to extreme identities, He must have pushed himself so hard to conform to the heterosexual norm that he ended up on the extreme side of conservatism and toxic heteronomative expectations. What I am saying saying, is he is in desperate need for mental help.
That’s an odd thing to say. They might just be adding some nuance to their analysis. If I used “but” as a conjunction in the conclusion of my thesis, does that mean it was only a paragraph long?
This rule doesn’t apply when you’re a piece of shit.
You are saying outrage and ridicule of gay for who they are is okay in some circumstances ?
I bet if it was straight porn we wouldn’t have heard of it here in lemmy. despite him having been against porn as well.
I’m saying if you’re a fucking nazi, and you gay bash, and then you get caught watching gay porn, Yeah, fuck you, you can be ridiculed for it.
Yeah, it seems to escape far too many people that him being a Nazi doesn’t suddenly make gay bashing ok.
Ridicule him for being a hypocrite? Sure. Call him a piece of shit or even punch him for being a Nazi? Abso-fucking-lutely!
Berate him for being gay, or perpetuate the idea that all homophobes are really just closeted gays though? Not fucking ok.
Not because of his feelings, but because of all of the gay people, closeted or otherwise, who see people still using gay as an insult or thinking that most/all those who abuse gay people are actually gay themselves (a twisted form of victim blaming), and realise that it isn’t just Nazis who are hypocrites, but so called allies, too.
Don’t use bigotry* to fight bigots, it shouldn’t need saying…
*And no, calling someone a Nazi, or a TERF, or cis, or white, isn’t bigotry. Basically don’t punch down, which again, shouldn’t need saying.
It should apply even more for people who are PoS. Crowd outrage isn’t good. It isn’t factual and leads to worse things.
I’m quite ok with crowd outrage over nazi’s, you’re not?
I believe all people should be treated humanely. Whether that’s behind bars for their entire life or not is up to their nazi asses.