Correct me if I’m wrong, but that responsibility is limited to during working hours and/or inside the workplace. (And to be clear, I’m referring to their employer, Canada Post, not the Canadian Government, who does have the right to enforce similar mandates in a Public Health Emergencies like the one we just had)
Including the three genders?
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Racism.
The original article contains 1,540 words, the summary contains 1 word. Saved 99%. I’m a human and I’m ashamed.
Also, it was grape flavour, not cherry flavour Flavor Aid.
“could arrive soon”
The “zone of secrecy” is there for practical reasons, and based on that quote, it remains in full effect.
Thanks. The article title “tricks for Lent” points to the non-serious nature of it. Plus, it uses the phrase “According to legend” several times and doesn’t even mention the particular monestaries, nor the specific monks involved. I think it’s just meant to be a humorous jab at legalism.
Typically, if practices get so bad that they have to be forbidden by an administrative authority, then you would have some written document forbidding the practice. Although that would acknowledge it wasn’t legitimate to begin with, it would at least suggest the histriocity of it.
I tried to look this up, but ended up empty-handed. Could you point me in the right direction?
The point has been missed.
There are temporal consequences of sin, even after guilt is removed.
Also. around the mediterrainian, fish is a food staple of the poor. The point is to eliminate excess.
I’d argue that an inlander ordering fish at a fancy restaurant on a Friday during Lent is not following the spirit of the law (which can be more of a discipline than a rule, depending on the local episcopal authority), especially if it’s not a special occasion and the fish was caught hundreds of kilometers away.
My favourite is:
Them: We want less red in the pie chart. Fix that remote vulnerability.
Me: We don’t even have that component enabled. It’s reporting on a DLL file version, not the vulnerability itself.
Them: Just lower our vulnerability score.
(Me wondering if I deploying dozens of fully-patched systems would have the same proportional effect)
Tenable (or how our security folks have our scans configured) doesn’t seem to get that.
If we respond to this, does it count as virtue signaling?
I avoided going to the bi-weekly coke sale at Shopper’s Drug Mart. Looks like I’ll be pouring my drinks a bit rich for the next little while. Ever since Loblaws bought them and the subsequent price increase, I’ve been less confident that it really is the loss-leader I’ve been led to believe it was. Then, my wife had a prescription faxed there since our local pharmacy had already closed for the day.
I grumbled about it and had it transferred to the co-op, since I had been meaning to get set up there (3rd party insurance and all).
Target sells groceries.
Ohh, you’ve just found a great workaround to a problem I have with my Google TV. It direct plays 4K HDR videos with ogg audio (quite poorly, I might add) I’d rather have transcoded.
Nah, he’s had his reportable soundbite. He’s quiet because he’s just thinking of another way to catch the media’s attention. His voter base gobbles this stuff up.
You’d think they would have led with that if that were the case.