But still you learnt nothing.

My God you guys have either the worst comprehension possible it’s [both sides bad]

You

That’s not really how anything works.

No, US healthcare is many times more expensive than healthcare in developed countries with universal healthcare.

You are being bled dry by the insurance industry while still parrotting their propaganda in favour of them.

He was not considered the king of Jews by the Jews though (except mockingly). I should think they would have a say in the matter.

Well, according to the person you replied to Christians doesn’t exist, so it is a moot questions.

What are you even on about?

There are zero contemporary primary sources for his existence.

We have a lot more contemporay primary sources for the existence of Socrates than we have of Jesus (of which the number of contemporary primary sources is 0).

No, there arent a lot of texts from the 1st century AD about him. The majority by far stems from the second century or later.

Written up to a couuple of centuries after his supposed existence.

There most definitely is.

You are the one who is doing the misinforming. All of the sources you mention, except Josephus, were written up to more than a century after his supposed existence. With Josephus being written around half a century after his existence.

And as mentioned, the specific quotes from Josephus are of a dubious nature.

No, OPs question was perfectly fine, because it is necessary to stress the fact that we have not a single contemporary primary source that Jesus existed. So adding extra parameters is pretty pointless, since we cannot convincingly answer whether he actually existed, much less whether he was a religious figure. Scholars have reached a conjectural consensus that a Jesus in some form likely existed, but it is a consendus based on congecture and circumstantial evidence in the form of later secondary sources.

Completely unlikely since no such census records are extant.

People who are jnfamilhar with the historiography are very much overestimating the amount of primary source material which exists from the Roman Empire, simply because historians have been very good at extracting information from the miniscule fraction (relative to the amount which was produced) of extant written sources we do have from the period.

There are no such records. Just having any extant census records from the Roman Empire would have pretty sensational, let alone some stemming from Judea at the supposed time of Jesus.

The Nero reference you are mentioning was written by Tacitus over a century after he was supposed to have lived. The fact of the matter js that there is no contemporary primary rvidence of hus exisrence.

Sure, but the fad about them among the kids is recent.

Or basically any European mythology.

Pizza al taglio?