@dessalines@lemmy.ml you forgot my fix Filter_removed_comments_from_search #4634

Dude, please stop spreading misleading information about value creation, made up value definitions and hiddenly legitimate crypto claiming out of thin air that people holding it were not scammed/manipulated/fooled, but acquire crypto because of some “value” they see in it

You do know that value is a subjective form of perception right?

No, I don’t. Who told you this crap? Read this, seems you need this right now -> https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Value. You are welcome

And actually has no mechanism to store value… so called value is based on a pure speculation

I cannot agree, we should try to help people to avoid ponzi. It is hard for people to resist marketing campaigns and opinion leaders trying to involve more people into ponzis

looks pretty ponzi to me, mods comments made things even worse ^_-

Actual comment that triggered ban

Comment they claim they didn’t like

Looks great!

I took some cpp examples as guidance. As for geek for geeks agree, one shouldn’t blindly trust it and better use several sources. Adding more reliable sources is definitely point of improvement. I also used introduction to algorithms paperback book, but was lazy to add it as a source ^_

0

Probably the only thing that makes it stable

Yep

Bernie Madoff scheme covers both of your arguments: it lasted for ca. 17 years and even seemed quite legit at some point for Wall Street guys.

I think it is a tricky question and the right answer is : No one :)

Oh thats good one

What is the first one?

Append only databases are pretty common thing , thats true. Never heard of internal enterprise blockchains though

The whole future you mean timechain?

So one clear use case is to have a plan to have a use case? Totally legit