If such a person doesn’t deserve sympathy, who does?

Do we need to do anything? Microsoft updates do the bulk of the work - surely everyone has a last straw?

Dislexia* /j

Could be a Ternary operator.

Now this thread contains more Technology than most Musk ones.

Peek Technology ! /s

No mention of a license but it talks about being the “official version”, suggesting one can fork it.

Stack overflow error on recursive function “blame parents” at line 1.

I use CoreCtrl to control my GPU, mainly for setting a lower power limit and controlling max fan speed. May not be ideal for a new users as, last time I checked, it is difficult to install.

A notable part of Evan Boehs getting Truth Social to be AGPL complaint is that they are not the copyright holder, which gives a lot of hope. An “end user” suing for compliance hasn’t been concluded in court yet (there is one in process SFC vs [edit] Vizio). If that succeeds then perhaps getting compliance will be easier in the future!

Sadly getting compliance also includes them just engineering the non-compliant code out - so they enjoy the use of free software for some time without ever giving back.

There are many companies that violate the GPL by not sharing their modified code on redistribution. Eventually they comply on request or lawsuit (in thanks to the Software Freedom Conservancy). It’s not the contribution OP is after (direct project interaction) but I consider getting access to their changes to be °giving back to the community°.

If it’s one dude not contributing back I ain’t that worrried but if it’s a big company then that ain’t good. It’s doing free work which could have been paid for (if not to yourself then to someone else doing the work for pay). Also, I value software freedom so I consider proprietary software to be harmful in of itself.

Perhaps they add code to split physics and grsphical fps.

Innovate means needing to pay for an online service to transfer saves between consoles, saves stored on an SD card?

Do they DMCA fan made games because the game concepts have been fully fleshed out?

When copyright expires for FZero in a century perhaps we can find out if there’s more to be done (well, not us personally).

I now require people who offer me to try out a solar powered car to provide directions to said car, lest your comment be labeled a sarcastic cock-tease.

If removing the script doesn’t stop it crashing then perhaps it was never the script’s fault. Might be worth seeing if others have had your issue: https://github.com/godotengine/godot/issues

Sorry I can’t be much help but if you revert your recent changes does it still crash?

Which projects?

you’ve implicitly agreed to it when creating your account

Many people would agree with that, probably most laws do. However I doubt many users have actually bothered to read the unnecessarily long document, fewer have understood the legalese, and the terms have likely already been changed ~pray I don’t alter it any further~. That’s a low and shady bar of consent. It indeed sucks and I think people should leave those platforms, but I’m also open to laws that would invalidate that part of the EULA.

I get what you mean but at face value that sounds like LGPL is the issue, rather than Apple.

MIT may attract more people… but why would that be people who would contribute back in the direct you want? I’ve seen many MIT extentions for Godot, maybe they would have some insight.

Most indie devs make their MIT Godot games proprietary and I doubt peer pressure has ever stopped companies from taking MIT work and making it proprietary before. If software freedom of your users is important then the copyleft aspect is an important way to protect their freedom. Imo, not worth losing that on the off-chance it all goes well.

That wasn’t the “sudo”, MS just named something else “sudo”.