This is where it all started for me. So it’ll be a high bar. Though I will say the Urusei Yatsura remake has been pretty good.

A lot of people here are “use Linux!” Well as Linux’s desktop share goes up, so does it being a target for attacks. The more people you have, the less that are going to configure it correctly (that’s just a fact, and not everyone will be their parents tech support) so it’s just a matter of time.

Another thing to your point is most clients now support blocking communities or entire instances, so by doing this you’re leaving the power and the choice to the users to block as they want at a client level.

My biggest fear is the first targets will be the “mildly well off, but basically top of the working class” because those are people that are visible and are your neighbors or people you know that can actually take a vacation, and the 0.1% will stoke that as a way of keeping the spotlight off of them.

Now if only we could get Trump to do the same damn thing.

Now they’re trying to co-opt the word “progressive”

This is part of the reason Google was trying to push Web Environment Integrity. They could literally DRM the endpoints and webpage and lock any 3rd party out that they didn’t approve.

And a lot of this comes from not fucking voting. I seriously wonder how things would be if voting was mandatory and everyone was given appropriate time off to do it.

"It’s better to reign in Hell, than to serve in Heaven.” — John Milton

I think he was meaning because of how easy it is to spoof and intercept sms. Use some thing like OTP that’s a common standard instead.

I read it and was like “140 isn’t too bad”. Then I noticed it said per day, wtf?!

Because of course it has…

Offer: high speed rail to connect the north and reduce people’s transit time

Best we can do: price hikes and fewer seats

I mean he had to pay for the repairs somehow /s

Calculate your ROI first, but beyond that you don’t really want to plug a UPS into what is essentially another UPS. Quite a few units are sensitive to normalized sine waves and will constantly go on battery which negates what you’re looking for.

His conjecture could still be valid.

I made the joke that we’ll have SystemD/Linux replacing GNU/Linux and the number of “well asckuallys…” that popped up was simultaneously humorous and saddening.

Maximum Landing Weight and Maximum Takeoff Weight. Because of the stress put on the airframe when landing you don’t want a heavy plane. It’s easier to control when taking off because it’s smoother. So having the same weight on landing means the airframe will need to be beefed up, or you fly with less overall since more goes to the plane.

genocide joe

Tell me you’re a Russian supporter, without telling me you’re a Russian supporter… that’s all I needed to know, thanks for playing.

Posted this in another chat…

I’ve always been curious how electric planes will address MLW as they scale up. Even if you get similar energy densities and can cover MTOW, you generally count on reducing weight as you use up fuel and are lighter when you land. But with a battery your weight is going to be roughly the same. Will that mean you have to take into account the increased weight and will have less room for cargo/passengers?

No, no it’s not. And if Trump is elected again, it’s on anyone who things as much.