Thanks for the TL;DR!

😳

Didn’t conservatives whine endlessly about “activist jurists”? Def the pot calling the kettle black.

Snoo better watch Spez closely; he’s likely to be fucked next.

My Dad bought one and took it with us on family camping trips.

I still remember the weird and eerie warbles, chirps and harmonics; creepier than many camp fire ghost stories, under the right conditions.

Wage theft from children; those’re some real scumbags.

May she fail miserably, proving she’s a putz in yet another aspect of her life.

It’s specifically the gutting of benefits his voters use, yet they remain faithful. Fucking bewildering.

Obviously 55% of Americans may find Prevagen helpful.

The pebbles? I think they’re called Starlink, or something.

OMFG! A Texas court ruling that’s not a give away to the donor class? I thought it impossible!

For the rest of the story: https://archive.ph/YjZhI

Tile would be a poster child for this.

It begs to run constantly and acts pissed when you don’t allow it.

Everything old, is new again.

Ah. Thank you, that clarifies things; along with a cuppa java.

Confused? No. Seeking an apt analogy for this situation? Yep. Can you provide one, please?

“And regulating an industry which is on the cusp of working with our government and the states to bring internet everywhere finally could really jeopardize that critical and bipartisan goal by creating regulatory overhang, disincentivizing investment.” said Jonathan Spalter, president and CEO of broadband industry group USTelecom.

WTF bullshit is he spouting? Hate to break it to ya bud, the internet was conceived and executed…by the government. Or did you forget DARPA? On the cusp,ppphht.

And the rest of that word salad? Regulatory overhang? Disincentivizing? It’s all doublespeak for “padding shareholders pockets”.

The 21st century version of a DOS TSR program?

Make mine a Camel.

Think how many more there’d be if Texas alone went legal.