Yeah and almost any other drink contains water, what an effin’ rip-off!

/s

I do, but shush, don’t tell anyone! Still, nobody has complained about that so far.

My view is that not having separate artist folders is wild, but hey, whatever works for you.

All in all however specific folder structure is not terribly important to me; what’s important is that the tags are in order and that I can make the app I’m using present the stuff in the manner that I want.

For the files themselves lately I’ve been doing something like Country of Origin/Artist/Original Year - Album (Catalogue Number) (Release Year)/ (used to do it without the country, but at one point they became way too many, and I don’t really like organising by letter or whatever). I love foobar2000 with Facets because of the fact that you can shove any arbitrary tag into the files and then have columns show it (I’m doing that with the countries for example), but I’m now suffering a bit because of that habit - I started also self hosting my library and Navidrome that I’m using doesn’t like just any tags that you throw at it (it especially doesn’t like it if you have multiple releases of the same album that have come out in the same year).

Damn I feel old now. It feels like this came out like 5-6 years ago.

That’s reasonable.

Now I’m sad that it already has a name - I don’t get to name my diagnosis.

/s

The problem is when they’re perfectly organised in a different manner from what you expect :D

Maybe it’s intentional. I see this quite often as a way to drive engagement. If you post misinformation, a lot of people will rush to correct you. If you post something true and easily agreeable, people might just hit the “Like” button (or do nothing at all) and move on.

Yeah, you have a point, but then it’s a bit hypocritical of them to even have criteria for putting pages up in the results.

Blep.

AI will take over the world. You only need to tell it that there’s no cabbage.

There has been something similar for years: a page that basically says “Yeah, nah, we don’t have any information for that, but you might be interested in a totally irrelevant something else”, but phrased in a way that gets it high in the results. What’s astonishing is that Google doesn’t punish those pages.

She wasn’t so vocal previously; maybe she was the same kind of person back then too, but it wasn’t evident since people were judging her solely based on her work.

The other way around makes more sense IMO: “An existential crisis is just applied philosophy.”

Yup. It’s as if we’re assuming this friend is coding inside Notepad.

Where’s Hannah Montana Linux?

It’d be interesting to see that answered scientifically.

The opposite of the opposite of “left” is “wrong”.

Why does it rhyme with “shoot yourself in the foot”?