2·
18 days agodeleted by creator
Heresy_generator
- 0 Posts
- 490 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
Cake day: June 12th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
1·18 days agodeleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
It’s a publicly traded company; no competent person would buy in at the absurdly overinflated stock price that exists now. Because a competent person would recognize that Tesla having a market cap over 50% higher than Toyota’s is completely fucked and there is no way in hell anyone could make Tesla actually worth what it’s trading at. A competent person would also recognize that Tesla’s ridiculous valuation is because of the shameless lies of hype merchant and snake oil salesman Elon Musk who, if you purchase the company from him, will no longer be around to trick sad losers into believing his laughable promises about self-driving, or robots, or AI, or whatever the hype cycle brings next.
[Terminally online politicians think the pro-Russia/anti-Ukraine bots and shills are actually real people in America.]
deleted by creator
44·25 days agoYou’re not really talking about higher taxes, you’re talking about reworking the corporate tax system. As things stand now higher taxes would encourage more of this sort of behavior, not less.
Corporations only pay taxes on profits, so money spent on business activities, re-invested back into the company, paid to employees, etc. is not taxed. In this system, taxes are kind of a penalty paid for taking money out of the business; the higher taxes are the less incentivized profit-taking is.
If your company made $100 million in profits at a 20% tax rate you get to take home $80 million as opposed to re-investing $100 million back in the company and not paying any taxes, so the incentive to re-invest isn’t very high. But if your company made $100 million in profits at a 40% tax rate now you can only take home $60 million as opposed to re-investing $100 million, which becomes a much better value proposition on re-investment.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
It’s not a biological warfare lab, it’s a research lab and having a coronavirus research lab in the place where coronaviruses originate is the most obvious fucking thing in the world.
I imagine you must think all of the earthquake research labs in California cause earthquakes. And Japan’s tsunami research labs cause tsunamis. And the Ebola research labs in Africa cause Ebola.
3·1 month agodeleted by creator
They’re not specific about that but I would guess not:
https://bostondynamics.com/blog/electric-new-era-for-atlas/
They say it’ll be stronger and have a broader range of motion but I would suspect that using electric motors rather than hydraulics means the more explosive leaping and acrobatics are out. The old Atlas was just a test platform but this seems to be intended as an actual product.
It’s completely absurd that he’s saying this as an anti-bot measure. The bots exist because they generate revenue for the scumbags behind them, a small fee is just going to be part of doing business for them. He’s not trying to stop bots, he’s trying to monetize them and use them as an excuse to charge everyone. “The bot problem” will never be fixed and will be used as an excuse for every anti-user measure they put forward.
deleted by creator
3·1 month agodeleted by creator
Gee, I wonder what this site is. Let’s just search for “Ukraine” and see what we get:
Oh, it’s a Kremlin propaganda outlet. Thanks for sharing.