My GOG and Bandcamp libraries.
Admin & sysadmin of a Warframe-focused Lemmy instance at https://dormi.zone.
Developer of a UI mod for Vivaldi Browser: https://github.com/HKayn/vivaldi-vh
My GOG and Bandcamp libraries.
Ok. How do I get my friend group to use Revolt?
Then tell them what your pronouns are? I don’t get the issue here.
After switching to Kagi, I see no reason to return to an ad-supported search engine.
I’m currently at work, so disclaimer: the following is an AI-generated summary.
Thank you for mirroring Proton’s announcements here on Lemmy!
virtually no exposure at all
That is not correct: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40011314
You’re linking to a halfhearted attempt at an exposé written by someone who acts unreasonable towards any attempts at clarification.
I can understand the decision somewhat.
Putting “The Lord of the Rings” first in the title would imply that this furthers the main canon, when it’s actually only set in its universe.
They could have indeed chosen a better subtitle though, like “from The Lord of the Rings”.
I’ve seen hearsay that there have been Yuzu patches specifically to aid compatibility with TOTK before it was officially out, which would have greatly supported the “mainly/primarily used for piracy” argument in court.
With GOG, you can at least have full confidence that the game will continue to work without any outside connections.
Just why do people on Lemmy need to turn every unrelated post into some anti-capitalist rant?
I didn’t say they deserve no protection at all. You are twisting my words because my opinion doesn’t align with yours.
I advocate for games having a clear indicator for any online dependencies. I do not advocate for outlawing said dependencies or mandating “offline patches”.
If you are clearly told that you’re buying an ephemeral product and you are still surprised when it shuts down, then I don’t know what to tell you.
Again, why would it not fly in the EU?
This basically boils down to “read the terms & conditions”, which isn’t unreasonable.
If a game states in its terms that access may be revoked at any time and you buy the game, then you have no reason to be surprised when access is eventually revoked.
Obviously when terms aren’t clear enough or intentionally obfuscated, that’s indeed an issue for legislation to act upon.
Why wouldn’t it be legal?
I’m really curious to see how this will end up feeling.
And slightly worried about the amount of Forma I might need to adapt all my stuff.
All this wouldn’t be necessary if gamers would just stop buying games that are obviously live services with remote kill switches.
Because most gamers don’t care.
Order of operations is too ambiguous, needs more parentheses