Fair, but when a company is given the authority to run fully autonomous taxis in cities that’s a huge accomplishment. Granted they are cities that don’t see things like snow storms and I’m sure there is a good reason for that.
Fair, but when a company is given the authority to run fully autonomous taxis in cities that’s a huge accomplishment. Granted they are cities that don’t see things like snow storms and I’m sure there is a good reason for that.
There are already fully autonomous taxis in some cities. Tesla is nowhere near fully autonomous, but others have accomplished it.
And cash.
People have problems with Nextcloud? You only have to be careful when upgrading major versions of Nextcloud or its database. It’s your fault if you’re using the latest tag.
How could you not recognize the OG throat GOAT?
Honestly, I think this is the only reason Biden won in 2020. Trump once said he was like a war time president with the pandemic. If he had kept that mentality and rallied to battle it, I think he would have won. However, I’m not sure which scenario is worse in the long term… I suppose the darkest timeline is yet to be seen. If Trump wins in November, we will truly be in the darkest timeline.
Yeah, that’s why I can’t tell if they’re joking or serious…
I can’t tell if you’re joking or not, but that’s Zooey Deschanel.
Yes, but you buy it for the cool factor more than needing a work truck. It’s not a good comparison, just the best one I can think of.
They may not be earning profit, but they’re definitely building equity that can be cashed in at retirement. No real reason to doubt the statement.
But OP just said it’s not a job in the meme. Which is it?
But you could replace just about any product with that statement.
Despite technically being a truck, they don’t really compete with trucks. Maybe they compete with Ford Raptors, but not “real trucks.” The only people that are going to buy them are the ones that think it is cool, which are probably not truck guys.
I didn’t say you can’t do both. The real danger is the green washing. In fact, it’s not a danger, it’s currently already used to subvert carbon cap and trade regulations. Scams of companies that sell carbon credits for protecting forestry that aren’t endangered to begin with. There is little to no oversight of this and is hurting our progress to fixing the issue.
Well, kind of… Reducing carbon emissions would be far more effective than trying to capture the emissions we currently use.
I didn’t say I don’t like trees, just they aren’t the solution. They’re often used as green washing and delay actually effective things like carbon cap and trade. I don’t know what the solution will be. If it were simple enough for me to solve it, it wouldn’t be a problem we’re facing.
Yep, that was my original point. Trees just can’t cut it. They have such a little impact they’re almost not worth even discussing. Far larger gains can be found elsewhere.
Yeah, like I said, a ridiculous amount of trees according to that calculator. That calculator said I’m in the top 5% and would take just over 200 trees a year. If we make the assumption that all of the top 5% also need 200 trees a year (it’smuch more likely that number sky rockets as the percentage gets lower), that’s 70,000,000,000 trees a year. To put some scale to that it looks like 14m hectares were lost to deforestation in 2010 and from what I see the most generous number is about 900 trees per hectare. That’s 12,600,000,000 trees. Stopping all deforestation won’t even come close to covering 5% of the CO2. Again, trees never will be enough to make up for the CO2 being pumped out of the ground and into the air.
Not yet. As part of the IPO, he can’t sell stock for 6 months. It being high at any point before that does nothing for him.
Biden is doing a good enough job ruining his own campaign. He is alienating his last base group, the young voters.