There already are a small number of games utilizing LLMs. Yes it‘s immersion breaking from time to time but the worst part is the credit system many of them use to pay for the API. If you go past your conversation limit, you‘ve got to pay extra.

You know I‘m worried you might be exactly on point with this assumption. I still give some of them the benefit of doubt because humans can „reason“ themselves into pretty dangerous things by appealing to authority and the like. Doesn‘t make all of them evil but sure as hell way too gullible for the field they‘re working in.

Well I know a lot of German companies that would look for alternatives immediately if their management actually used the internet and knew about this.

This is the Brussels effect at work, everyone.

You would think space engineers would‘ve run those numbers before sending tens of thousands of them in orbit. It‘s really annoying that we can only hope for the best at this point.

Well duh they‘ve done the same when „working with“ German universities doing civilian drone groundwork. (Pun unintended) Scholarship programs are just a cheap way for them to get access to core technologies and they will utilize them for military use if possible. Maybe we should think twice before exposing our research to a systematic rival that seeks world domination and has been known for stealing tech.

It‘s exactly this dangerous mindset that‘s riding us in some AI service hellhole. Too many super talented developers have told themselves exactly that instead of standing up for their principles or even allowing themselves to have principles in the first place.

Only recently have they started leaving companies like OpenAI and taking a stance because they‘re actually seeing what their creation is used for and with how little care for human life it‘s been handled.

Of course many critics knew this was headed towards military contracts and complete Enshittification. It was plain to see OpenAI founders aren‘t the good guys but „someone else would do it anyway“ kept the underlings happy. This deterministic fallacy is also why anyone still works for Meta or Google. It‘s a really lazy excuse.

Oh of course. My point wasn‘t that there‘s already easier ways to replace all workers. It was more about that humanoid robots sure ain‘t it. The upkeep cost and fail rates are way too high to be cost effective and we won‘t see more of them than small test facilities that only exist as a bad proof of concept to pressure employees.

Humanoid robots are awfully expensive to maintain and a silly idea for factories. The team of robot experts you’d need to run this operation would cost much more in the end. You‘d be better off just building fully automated factories that use conveyor belts and wheeled robots. In other words, this is just Amazon propaganda to discourage unions and keep wages low. Robots are not on the way to replace us but rich fucks have every reason to make us believe so.

I think it’s not so much about renewables. Looks more like they‘re already running out of money because of insane overspending and need money now.

Yes, some of the biggest crypto providers are de facto chinese. They trade big time, always have. When techno idealists in the west were still discussing Bitcoin as a free currency over a decade ago, china already ran gigantic crypto miner farms and saw it only as a speculative asset. They knew from the very first day it‘s not about using crypto, but making money trading and holding it.

Bill founded the entire company on monetizing open source code from software enthusiasts across the world. If anyone knows what open source means, it‘s them.

Absolutely and the remade soundtrack is great too!

Tell me it’s a silly opinion, but I don’t care about arbitrary stock news and I think they don’t belong in a place like c/technology. Even when it’s about the two biggest tech giants. I would like to discuss Apple’s AI if they ever have anything to show for it but until then it’s just hot air like their emission pledges.

That’s kind of the Russian law, yes. Russians can even hack people and steal all their data and money as long as they’re not Russians or in Russia. It’s a legit business model over there.

I’m not exaggerating when I say there’s only like a dozen true experts for generative AI on the planet and even they’re not completely sure what’s going on in that blackbox. And as far as I’m aware Tim Cook isn’t even one of them. How would he know?

Ich bin da ganz bei dir. Der Club Deutscher Unternehmer (CDU) und Anhang wollten unbedingt unmündige Schafe, die sich leicht treiben lassen. Jetzt wo sie das Ruder an Radikale verlieren, die siese Schafe besser wissen einzufangen, radikalisieren sie sich mit um nicht den Anschluss zu verlieren. Nicht, dass treten nach Unten und Fremdenfeindlichkeit neu bei der CDU wären, aber es nimmt jetzt wieder in einer rasanten Geschwindigkeit zu. Danke für nichts, Merkel. Wirklich.

We say “the doctor” when talking about the concept of a doctor. We tend say “my doctor” and not “the doctor” when talking about what our respective doctor told us. Kind of like how we refer to the clock as “my clock” when we notice a difference to the universally accepted concept.

Schade, dass der Wille, sich endlich von der Assoziation mit Reddit zu lösen, nicht groß genug ist. Wirkt nach wie vor wie „Reddit aber Lidl Eigenmarke“ statt etwas eigenes zu sein.

Wäre so ein klassisches Ampel-Ding nach den Ergebnissen der Europawahl am Wochenende noch mehr bei Bildung zu sparen, damit Schwarz-Blau auch garantiert weiter von jungen Erwachsenen gewählt wird, die offensichtlich massive Bildungslücken haben.