All posts/comments by me are licensed by CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
From the article …
Thwaites, which already contributes 4% to global sea level rise, holds enough ice to raise sea levels by more than 2 feet. But because it also acts as a natural dam to the surrounding ice in West Antarctica, scientists have estimated its complete collapse could ultimately lead to around 10 feet of sea level rise — a catastrophe for the world’s coastal communities.
That’s a lot of beachfront and riverside properties that would end up going underwater.
From the article …
Among Apple’s earliest tactics, a bold one even by corporate standards, was to offer all but the Towson store workers new educational and medical perks, saying that the nascent union would have to negotiate for those perks while nonunion workers would be able to enjoy them immediately. The IAM CORE members claimed it was a “calculated” move by Apple, timed just ahead of a second retail union vote at a store in Penn Square, Oklahoma
Luckily, the bid failed and a majority of Penn Square’s Apple workers chose to unionize.
Apple’s ugly maneuver echoed that of Starbucks corporation a year later. The coffee giant increased hourly pay for all but its union workers. The NLRB also ruled against Starbucks.
That’s some shitty psyop moves by those two companies. Glad they didn’t work.
How do you cope with, life and the decaying world around you?
Decay is a constant. But so is renewal. If you remember that, then that gets you through your life experiences.
Mine is nostalgia. That’s literally my copium drug and it really is strong some days.
Nostalgia is great, especially in helping you remember the past. But you shouldn’t focus exclusively on that, as then it just becomes a drug, and you become the monkey in the cage pushing the button over and over again for the next pellet of food.
Why did you attach a link about Creative Commons and copyright laws?
Oh, no particular reason at all. Just seemed like a fun thing to do.
🤷😋😇
All kidding aside, that’s something of a loaded question.
Instead of a repeating myself, yet again, let me just point you to this topic…
https://lemmy.world/comment/9850401
Just click on the “View all Comments” link, to go to the top of the topic. It’s a full discussion.
If you want something more recent (like yesterday recent), then I’d point you to this topic…
https://lemmy.world/comment/10144269
Otherwise, you can look through the last threeish weeks of my posting comment history, and you’ll see the same subject come up multiple times, and be discussed.
Edit: Wow, seven down votes in just a few seconds from time of posting the comment. That must be a record.
Edit2: Hmmm, the responses seem strangly familiar. … 🤔 Seems like someone is trying really hard to push a certain agenda/perspective.
Did he give you a reason why?
If you click “source” on a deleted comment, you can see what was written before it was deleted on the Mlmym interface.
Sounds like they’re caching the comments, and not honoring the deletion request by removing the comment from their cache.
Can you at least make the text smaller? That way people aren’t as bothered by it, but you still have your licence?
I already did actually, a couple of weeks ago.
I’m using the Lemmy web editor. The web client doesn’t let you change font sizes, but it does let you mark font as subscript or superscript, which is a smaller font size, so I did that.
My understanding is some mobile clients have problem with the subscript/superscript formatting, and the cause of that is on their end, not supporting the format text yet.
If you don’t see my license declaration in a smaller font, direct the devs of your client to look at this page, which is the formatting instructions from Lemmy, and specifically the subscript and superscript formatting.
Nice stats, thanks for sharing.
But you need to add one more stat, for paywalled or not, including if they count how many articles you’ve read before they put up the ‘must subscribe’ paywall.
Others don’t see the text of the comment though, it just says comment is deleted.
To answer your question, basically for Federation reasons (if I had to guess).
Its the same way with when you block someone, you’re not blocking them from the seeing you, you’re blocking yourself from seeing them. They can still respond to your comments and you wouldn’t know they had.
If your comments are going to gum up the thread with a segment that they don’t think will have any effect, what’s a few more to match?
Well their comments are their responsibility, not mine (you shouldn’t ‘blame the victim’), so I can’t talk towards their actions, except to say that each of us are supposed to behave civilly here on Lemmy, and not bully others to conform.
“Your license doesn’t do what you say it does.”
“Haha, joke’s on you, I don’t want it to do what I say it does.”
Glad we figured that one out.
Whatever lets you sleep at night.
I would have liked to seen some Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle books listed there, but a good list overall, with a couple that I actually haven’t read, but look forward to doing so.
Hahahahaha god damn what a load of bullshit. Did you also paste that image on Facebook?
Best not to derail this topic. It’s been discussed to death already.
You are writing “anti-commercial AI,” they are making their work explicitly available to republish non-commercially.
That’s just a description of what the license actually does, non-commercial usage of my content.
It’s actually not even my description, it’s one I got from someone else, who’s also licensing their content with the same license.
I have no problem with my content being used for non-commercial purposes.
You have completely different motivations.
No, I do not. My intent aligns with ProPublica.
I don’t think the license does anything at all
ProPublica would disagree with you.
you are not also including some unique phrase or UUID
The specific license number is explicitly stated.
How are you going to prove their models used specifically your copyrighted content in the event that courts rule it is not fair use to do so?
Already discussed in that other conversation post.
This comment is explaining it very well: https://lemmy.ml/comment/10762134
I’ve explained myself quite well in that conversation.
And again, no need to repeat, it’s all there already. Unless you guys just enjoy repeating yourself again and again with zero effect.
Remember I’m pullin’ for ya–we’re all in this together. ✊🏼
Thanks, and no disrespect meant, but I would believe that more if you did license your own comments as well.
In case you need the formatting for it, here it is…
[~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.en)
Feel free to replace the link to point to whatever license you wish to use for your own content, if you do not want to use the same one that I am using.
My guess is that people disagree with propagating the delusion that pasting that link in every comment helps with stopping AI from feeding on your input.
ProPublica disagrees with you.
But best not to derail this topic. It’s been discussed to death already.
Well that link just leads to somebody mocking you then leads to another thread about how the license thing is totally bullshit lol
You’re being intellectually dishonest.
It points to a comment that has a link to a ProPublica article posted on Lemmy that also uses a Creative Commons license in the description for the post.
And if you instead go to the top comment of my linked comment (‘View all comments’ link), then you’ll see the whole long conversation that I refer to, where every point has already been discussed.
Any particular song you are referring to?
Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)