• usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    I disagree some obligations you are still bound by whatever the other party does. To give a microcosm argument if your wife cheats on you it’s still wrong to beat her up.

    Killing the romanovs was for the russians a sad necessity as otherwise they would have been weaponised and it was still a great wrong Nicholas and his wife less so but the kids that was actually wrong. It would have been far better to go the Puyi route or raise the children anonymously or something

    • ThomasMuentzner [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      "§ 241 Para. 1 BGB describes the performance obligations:

      By virtue of the obligation, the creditor is entitled to demand performance from the debtor. The performance can also consist of an omission. "

      in this case the Injured Party choose “omission” and you may have noticed , it worked very well , the Tsars have not violated any Obligation ever since.
      soviet-playful