seasonone@opidea.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoSarah Silverman sues OpenAI, Meta for being “industrial-strength plagiarists”arstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1185
arrow-up1185external-linkSarah Silverman sues OpenAI, Meta for being “industrial-strength plagiarists”arstechnica.comseasonone@opidea.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square41fedilink
minus-squaremrmanager@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThen why are we banned from using certain words on social media?
minus-squarejgardner10@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year agoJust because you can freely say something doesn’t mean I have to forced to listen to it.
minus-squaremrmanager@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoAnd that means that the words cannot be used, which means they are not owned by you. If you could use them, you would own them right?
minus-squareCail@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoBut the words can be used, just not in that specific space. If you’re not allowed to bring a gun to a restaurant it doesn’t mean the restaurant suddenly owns the bullets.
minus-squareQuokka@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoThat’s a completely unrelated topic. You’re talking about censorship, I’m talking about ownership.
Then why are we banned from using certain words on social media?
Just because you can freely say something doesn’t mean I have to forced to listen to it.
And that means that the words cannot be used, which means they are not owned by you. If you could use them, you would own them right?
But the words can be used, just not in that specific space. If you’re not allowed to bring a gun to a restaurant it doesn’t mean the restaurant suddenly owns the bullets.
deleted by creator
That’s a completely unrelated topic.
You’re talking about censorship, I’m talking about ownership.