• sab@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    What these economists always fail to capture is that people prefer using services they are happy with. They figured they could lose a certain amount of users because the remaining users will remain and pay more per person. What they fail to take into account is that the people left are going to be way less happy with the service, and actively looking for replacements.

    It’s the same story all over. And unlike Reddit and Twitter, Netflix was actually making a profit.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What they fail to take into account is that the people left are going to be way less happy with the service, and actively looking for replacements.

      That’s built right into the Elasticity of Demand. The economic term phrase is search for substitution.

      "When consumers make buying decisions, substitutes provide them with alternatives. Substitutes occur when there are at least two products that can be used for the same purpose, such as an iPhone vs. an Android phone. For a product to be a substitute for another, it must share a particular relationship with that good. Those relationships can be close, like one brand of coffee with another, or somewhat further apart, such as coffee and tea. "

      What this means is they can actively calculate the number of subscribers they will lose when they increase the price of the product. They can also calculate the amount of more money they’ll get with higher subscriber fees. They compare the two numbers and choose the one that makes them the most money.

      • sab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They can (and indeed do) calculate the direct effects by the price increase, and the initial loss of users is expected.

        What I think they lack good models for is customer loyalty in a deeper sense. Sure, a lot of people are going to stick around in the short the short term, but Netflix is completely eradicating the competitive advantage it had a few years ago. These decisions might very well maximise profits in the short term, but in the long term I think they’re undermining the very things that made Netflix such a success in the first place.