• Junkers_Klunker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    8 months ago

    No, they (both sides) need to respect the other sides historical right to the land and need accept that they might need to live beside each other if they want to live on that piece of land.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Ελληνικά
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        I BET YOU JUST WANT EVERYONE TO STOP KILLING EACH OTHER.

        YOU MUST WANT ISRAEL/PALESTINE/NO-ONE TO WIN YOU OUT OF TOUCH WESTERNER.

        • mwguy@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Since the end of the cold war Israelis have pushed her to peace. Since the assassination of Rabin Israel, while divided on the issue, has largely been willing to go down a path to peace, independent coexistence. As evidenced by the various peace deals they’ve signed to that extend.

          The violence from Gaza after the 2004 deal, which established the 67 borders and evicted all settlers from Gaza; has unfortunately caused Israel to stop believing peace is possible.

          Gaza was a prove it deal, if there’s no peace im Gaza there’s no reason to believe a similar action in the West Bank would lead to peace.

    • burchalka@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      From wikipedia article on a city of Acre:

      Today there are roughly 48,000 people who live in Acre. Among Israeli cities, Acre has a relatively high proportion of non-Jewish residents, with 32% of the population being Arab.

      Now, how many Jewish residents there are in Gaza strip (after 2005 unilateral disengagement)? Which side seems to respect the other side historical right to live in peace?