Somehow paying for Netflix is fine but god forbid I want to watch a 10 hour loop of the DS9 intro without ads.

  • Dalkor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I understand your first point, that its frustrating for something thats always been free with limited to no ads to change its model.

    The thing I want to know though is, YouTube costs a shit ton in terms of infrastructure and development hours, do you have a suggestion on how they can host the public and private content they host and deliver hundreds of petabytes a day while turning a profit? Do you stop user uploads, delete channels that have been inactive for a decade, delete private videos of non-subscribers?

    Inb4 well they shouldnt exist because thats not how they formed tired argument ive seen, then my question is, ok so lets say we’re thinking up a YouTube replacement. How do we model it so the company makes money, people arent the product, i can upload what I want, watch it for free without ads, people who draw others to the platform make money too, ect… What gets cut?

    Edit: Because I don’t have a suggestion and I dont think its possible to get anything like the old YouTube we all loved without making major consessions, otherwise I think we’d have more than a handful of compeitors.

    • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sadly I don’t have a great solution to make YouTube into anything as good as what it used to be. It’s grown too big and expensive to run without offering anything to increase it’s real value to consumers. As corporate greed increases it will probably eventually become an exclusively paid service, at which point I’ll probably just stop watching it altogether.