FUCKING DO IT

The fee should be about 1000x higher than listed, but shit, do something

  • Wertheimer [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    8 months ago

    The new fee is expected to generate as much as $20 million per year, which really isn’t a lot when you consider how much infrastructure projects can cost. And that’s largely because the proposed fees aren’t exactly punitive. Even if you own a 9,000-lb Hummer EV, you’ll reportedly only pay an extra $29.90 per year. Additionally, the fee would only be charged in the 12 most populous counties because it’s supposed to target the places where pedestrian and bicycle accidents happen the most.

    No more half-measures, Walter.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I wish this law luck against the daunting power of Burgerlanders chanting “DON’T TELL ME WHAT TO DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO” grill-broke

  • FUCKRedditMods@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I’m in North Carolina and I find myself picking out vehicles and saying “DEAD” in my head if they’re designed to obliterate pedestrians and other vehicles. So many goddamn lifted trucks, so many massive flat front ends.

    Just the other day I counted like 29 deads, vs 4 lives, and 9 maybes

  • culpritus [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 months ago

    This reminds me of the anti-slavery prop that passed in Colorado, then a judge looked at it and was like “na that’s not what that really means lol”.

    i-voted

  • LeylaLove [she/her, love/loves]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    Even ignoring deaths caused by the size of these being unsafe, people should realistically pay tax based on the weight of their vehicle. We actually have a formula to find out how much force a car is putting on the road, which is totally proportional to how much damage it does to the road. Formula to compare damage between vehicles is (weight of vehicle 1/weight of vehicle 2)4. This is an exponential function. Which means, my Prius (pretty much the best car you can get for this) does 50,000x more damage to the road than a bicycle with an exceptionally heavy person on it. A car being an extra thousand pounds isn’t just an extra thousand pounds of weight on the road, it’s (pretty much, this is NOT exact, I’m too high to really think about my old notes) 10004 more damage to the road.

    With this knowledge, cars are barely even a real issue. The study was taken down unfortunately, but a loaded semi is pretty much the equivalent of 10,000 cars. There is an argument to be made that road maintenance would be completely financially viable if it we had high speed rail to replace semis. Ignoring any leftist slant and just going into the universe that carbrains inhabit, this is something carbrains should support. Semis objectively suck to drive around, you can’t pass them on the right side unless you have a death wish, and passing in the passing lane is still questionable with their lines of sight. Also because of the insane exploitation of these truckers by corporations, the people driving these trucks shouldn’t be driving. My old drugs of choice was SUPER popular among truckers because you don’t get tested for it unless you’re on probation and have a smart officer. It wasn’t a stimulant per se, more like alcohol with far less numbing and stupidity. But if you took the right dose, it would let you stay up for DAYS at a time without feeling it, and it wasn’t a heavy enough downer to make you tired unless you wanted it to make you tired. Plus, after you sleep on a decent dose, it becomes a full stimulant as a sleep med. You can get this drug at a TON of gas stations, I’ve seen Casey’s, Love’s, and Maverick all stocking it. At best, the trucker you’re passing is extremely sleep deprived and running off 72 hours of drinking coffee. At worse, you’re dealing with someone using meth to stay up or (I’m not saying what my old DOC is, once you start learning about it it crosses from a normal drug to a straight cognition hazard) speedyxanaxtm to not feel the effects of staying up. Either way, they’re essentially driving 10,000 cars at a time when they realistically shouldn’t even be driving 1.

  • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    If this passes it could definitely reduce the arms race because in order to be safe on the road, you also need a death machine.

    The one critique that is somewhat valid is that many people do need trucks for work, but what’s missing from this critique is that car manufacturers abandoned the small truck market and only peddles this bullshit. Small trucks are a dime a dozen unfortunately. But still. If people need trucks for work then maybe it’s time to demand the company pay for it

    • KarlBarqs [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      The one critique that is somewhat valid is that many people do need trucks for work

      There is almost no work the average contractor can do that wouldn’t be better served with a cargo van like a Ford Transit. For anything that absolutely requires a bed, a trailer or Kei truck is superior

      • Vyvanse@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I see lots of trucks in my area that are pulling trailers loaded with equipment that a transit van or kei truck would never be able to haul safely or at all. Realistically, if we’re talking about work trucks, there does need to be a middle ground between a transit van/small pickup and semi trucks/heavy duty commercial vehicles. I do agree that most people with these giant vehicles definitely do not need them though.

        • fox [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          These monsters only exist because some nonsense laws make emissions standards much more lax for vehicles above a certain size threshold. They weren’t made to fill a gap in the market, they were made to evade taxes and marketing made people think the Canyonero was a good car to buy

  • Grownbravy [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve been noticing all the new pavement in the city having these two parallel tracks that show up after a little time, and there’s no coincidence

    • Mokey [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      All the benches, garbage cans, little stone artifaces and trees on the sidewalk are actually covert bollards to stop cars from running everyone over on either purpose or accident.