• AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I really don’t have a defining line. It’s very grey for me. I wouldn’t expect someone to take out a HELOC to pay out equity for their girlfriend that moved into a house, that he already owned, for six months. But on the other extreme, a couple that has been living together for five years feels like she should get something. Especially if she helped with the down payment like my GF did.

    Where the line between these two extremes is? I don’t really have a catch all answer. It’d have to be case by case.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      On helping with the down payment, I would absolutely agree with you, especially if y’all are in agreement that you’re buying it together. Now your other comment make more sense.

      That’s a completely different story than already having your own place and inviting someone to live with you. Maybe it’s just me, but I would want my gf to pay a fair share of living expenses, even if I were managing it on my own or with a roommate (I’m married and we’re stuck renting for now, so this was all hypothetical anyway).

      • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I fully agree. I don’t think people should be getting free rides, it just starts to feel weird when an investment is seen as an expense that someone is expected to contribute to.

        Utilities and shit though? 50/50 for sure. No greyness there. Another guy said they split the interest payment which I also think is fine. It’s really only the principle where I start to feel gross.

        (Well maybe not 50/50. I need my gigabit internet at any cost)