Imagine there’s a sequence of items, it started somewhere in the past and will keep on going. The kind of items could be anything – say days, or football matches, or lectures, or widgets out of an assembly line.

I’d like to refer to the future item that will be, say, the 100th if I start counting them from now. I hope you understand what I mean: the 1st would be the next, the 2nd would be the one after the next, and so on.

How do I denote that future 100th item with a concise expression? I thought of “the next 100th item”, but it doesn’t sound right.

The problem is that if I just say “the 100th item”, that refers to the number 100 since the sequence started, not the number 100 starting counting from now.

Example:

The last 10 widgets were red and blue; the 20th widget from now will be yellow.

Saying “the 20th widget from now” doesn’t sound right – but maybe it is? Nor does “the next 20th widget” sound right.

As usual, if possible please also give some references. Cheers!

  • BD1sHappyFeet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s not a specific name for it in the way you’re thinking. If you’re looking at object A, then object B is next. One could say that object C is “the one after that,” but it’s also just as common to say third. Anything larger than two (for this one and next) gets unwieldy and English just uses the number. It wouldn’t be the next 100th, simply the 100th. Spoken aloud, the “one” is dropped and it’s said as “the hundredth.” Usually, that is. You wouldn’t be incorrect in adding “the” because English likes to make up its own rules.

  • memmypemmy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It depends how you’re counting I think. If you’re just counting things, you would normally just say the number, “the 100th widget” or “the 100th day”. No need for any other descriptor. But if you’re counting things relative to time, I would say “100 widgets later” or “100 days later.” Next is very specific since it refers to only the thing directly after the current one, so it isn’t really used for high amounts of things.

    I don’t have a reference since this was never directly taught in any of the schools I went to. This is just how I’ve always heard other people say it.

    • stravanasu@lemmy.caOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you. The problem with “the 100th widget” is that it would refer to the 100th since the sequence started, but I’d like to refer the the 100th if I were to start counting now. “100 widgets later” is an adverb rather than an adjective, but maybe I can build a sentence around it.