• SerLava [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
      16·
      9 months ago

      Someone could read this and think that you can hallucinate apples but they’re grey. The problem with the whole discussion is that

      • some people can actually hallucinate at will
      • some people can’t hallucinate, and interpret the images as rough abstractions for sort of recalling the visual qualities of objects
      • some people can’t hallucinate, and interpret the images as hallucinations other people literally see
      • some people can’t remember what a thing looks like if they aren’t looking at it

      It’s very hard to figure out who a given person is, because they’re all like “I can see things” and “i can’t see things” and it’s meaningless

        • SerLava [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
          6·
          9 months ago

          I agree with that, it’s just that this discussion has been drawn out probably thousands of times without people becoming more deliberate about what they mean, and because of that, the vast majority of people leave this type of discussion knowing less than they did when they started

        • SerLava [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
          9·
          9 months ago

          I don’t really know anything about the subject, I’ve just nailed down these types of discussions and people have claimed in much clearer terms that they actually generate images in their visual field.

          It would actually be really interesting and pretty funny if none of that existed at all, and it’s literally all just people with the exact same sensory experience thinking everyone else has a totally different brain!