This link goes to Reddit, however, we have used a direct video link to avoid giving them ad revenue.

  • Rottcodd@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Presuming, for the sake of argument, that the consensus in the future comes to be that it is in fact murder, then yes - it’s rightly labeled “murder” regardless of the view one might hold.

    But that’s beside my point.

    To carry on with this particular context, what you’re asserting is that those who support a right to abortion believe that murder is okay, which is very much NOT what they in fact believe. They believe that it does not qualify as “murder” at all.

    So again, you’re misrepresenting what they actually believe, and doing so in order to saddle them with a moral position they do not in fact hold, snd that dishonesty, in my estimation, calls into question the notion that you actually are a moral person.

    Oh, and for the record, I think you’re wrong anyway. I think that when all of the reactionary, emotional fervor dies down and cooler heads prevail, the beginning of human life will be defined by the exact same thing that’s already the accepted marker for the end of human life - the presence or absence of measurable cortical activity.

    And curiously enough, cortical activity can only be detected in fetuses well into the second trimester.

    • BigToe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree with your logic, it is a massive logical fallacy to say that becuase something isn’t murder now that even if it’s seen as murder in the future it wasn’t murder in the past. Slavery now is still the same as slavery in the past and past atrocities do not become humane because they are viewed through the lens of time. Now legally speaking sure, if slaves are allowed then slavery is legal, but legality does not in any way dictate morality. This begs the question why do you keep insinuating that because something is legal then it is moral?

      • piecat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The premise of your argument is that they’re going to consider it murder in the future. But what if they don’t? Anyway, the logical fallacy is worrying about what future societies might think, since they’re not here now.

        Abortion is moral and merciful. Forcing an unwanted child into the world is cruel.

        Your opinion that a fetus deserves rights is something that most of us don’t respect here.