• stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unless it’s from China or any communist allies.

    Or any other foreign entity. The Bill of Rights wasn’t written to protect foreign governments or business interests.

    • Raphael@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      or business interests.

      According to the Supreme Court, businesses have human rights, are you defending the violation of human rights?

      How the turn tables.

      • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        foreign governments or business interests.

        Obviously meaning foreign governments or foreign business interests. Not sure how you misunderstood that.

        • Raphael@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I see, the USA should work on banning Toyota, Samsung, Siemens, Nestle and etc.

          Actually, just banning Nestlé for their slavery practices in Africa would be good enough.

          • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            100% agree about Neslte. And I’d be happy to expand the requirements to do business with America to include adhering to US labor regulations.

            But do you at least understand how the Bill of Rights doesn’t apply to this conversation at all now?

            • Raphael@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              100% agree about Neslte. And I’d be happy to expand the requirements to do business with America to include adhering to US labor regulations.

              Make it United Nations labor regulations and we’re set for a good time, comrade.

              • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Sure, that sounds good and all but do you understand the UN doesn’t have any legal power over its member nations? I’m interested in realistic, enforceable legal outcomes, not utopian dreams.

                Your idealism is fun, but you really need to read more and travel some to start peeling off that thick layer of naivety.

                • Raphael@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Sadly there’s a good chance Trump will win and implement the GOP’s project of Child Labor in the US.

                  I’m interested in realistic, enforceable legal outcomes, not utopian dreams.

                  America already follows many international regulations and applies them with the rule of the law.

                  • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Ah, I get it, you meant the US should voluntarily adopt UN labor regulations over defining their own because you assume UN regulations would be categorically better than what the US would ever define on their own.

                    Have you ever actually researched that or you just go from the premise that UN is better than the US because it’s not the US and the US is bad?